Kathleen Creamer And John Pollock

September 11, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer

As attorneys who represented amici in the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court case In re L.B.M., we write to respond to the June 26, public interest ­column describing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in that case, ("Providing a Voice for the Child in Court"). With respect for our colleagues at the Support Center for Child Advocates, we believe that this column understates both the breadth and the clarity of the court's holding in that case.

By Kathleen Creamer 
and John Pollock

4 minute read