April 16, 2016 | The Legal Intelligencer
Duty to Defend the Additional Insured Sued by Named Insured's EmployeeThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision Feb. 17 that is likely to have a significant impact on coverage for additional insureds sued in Pennsylvania by employees of the named insured.
By Kenneth M. Portner
14 minute read
September 18, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal
Testing the Limits of Auto Insurance ExclusionsGiven the Appellate Division's recent extension of Proformance to the "loading and unloading" exclusion, other potentially voidable auto policy exclusions should be similarly interpreted to be unenforceable only beyond the statutory minimum coverage.
By Kenneth M. Portner and Michael S. Savett
6 minute read
August 23, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal
Defense Fees for Noncovered Claims Subject to RecoveryAppellate decision provides insight as to how fee allocation issues should be handled, represents a New Jersey court's first statement on the applicable burden of persuasion, and confirms the right of an insurer to obtain reimbursement from its insured for the cost of defending noncovered claims.
By Kenneth M. Portner and Michael S. Savett
8 minute read
Trending Stories