Mayling Blanco Katey Fardelmann Sarah Perlin
August 15, 2024 | New York Law Journal
The Implication of SCOTUS's 'Snyder' Decision and Recent Precedent on Corruption ProsecutionsIn fraud and corruption cases, the Supreme Court and the US government are marching in opposite directions. The DOJ continues to embrace new tools from Congress and the White House—including a newly-passed anti-corruption law—while the Supreme Court has increasingly cut back on the DOJ's broad theories of prosecution. This article examines the implications from the Court's latest opinion, Snyder v. United States, which, if applied to other bribery statutes, could severely limit the DOJ's view that gifts to government officials are no different than bribes.
By Mayling Blanco, Katey Fardelmann, Sarah Perlin and Andrey Spektor
8 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1After Latham Mandates 4 Days in NY Office in 2025, Other Firms Sticking to 3 Days, For Now
- 2Christopher J. Morvillo: The Clifford Chance Partner Missing in Mike Lynch Yacht Disaster
- 3'Firms Fear the PR Hit, Not the Sanction': Big Law on Edge After Simpson Thacher AML Prosecution
- 4Am Law 200 Firm's Merger Yields 25% Attorney Growth and $60M More in Revenue
- 5'Big Law Killed My Husband': An Open Letter From a Sidley Partner's Widow
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read