July 13, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
Former Trump Lawyer Van der Veen Defends His Defamation Lawsuit Against Area Attorney in Court FilingLawyer Michael van der Veen, who represented former President Donald Trump at his second impeachment trial, said in a recent court filing that he had legal grounds to sue Philadelphia attorney Theodore Schwartz for an allegedly defamatory article Schwartz wrote about van der Veen's involvement with the Trump case.
By P.J. D'Annunzio
3 minute read
July 13, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
Nearly $250K in Legal Fees in Trade Secret Case Hinged on Just 1 WordU.S. District Judge Mark Kearney of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said the meaning of the word "applicable" was not so cut-and-dried when put in front of "attorney fees."
By P.J. D'Annunzio
4 minute read
July 09, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
Court Upholds Dismissal of Language Accessibility Class Action Against Philadelphia School DistrictThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the dismissal of a putative class action filed against the School District of Philadelphia by non-English-speaking parents who claimed they were denied adequate translation and interpretation services when discussing their children's individualized education plans with the district.
By P.J. D'Annunzio
3 minute read
July 09, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
Phila. Judge DiClaudio Suspended 2 Weeks, Put on Probation Until 2026 for Ethics ViolationsState ethics authorities have ordered a two-week suspension and a probationary term for Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Scott DiClaudio for ethics violations stemming from his involvement in a lawsuit over unpaid fees to a Bala Cynwyd racquet club.
By P.J. D'Annunzio
3 minute read
July 07, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
Superior Court Clarifies Immediate Collateral Appealability of In Camera Review OrdersAn en banc Superior Court panel consisting of President Judge Jack Panella and Judges Victor Stabile, Alice Beck Dubow, Deborah Kunselman, Carolyn Nichols, Mary Murray, Maria McLaughlin, Megan McCarthy King and Daniel McCaffrey quashed the appeal of Erie Insurance Exchange, which had objected to producing what it claimed were privilege documents for in camera review in an insurance dispute.
By P.J. D'Annunzio
3 minute read
July 06, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
Parenting, the Pandemic and Memories of Dad: Cozen Class Action Leader Meredith Slawe's Story"I learned quickly that I'm not equipped to do sixth-grade math homework," Slawe said. Helping her kids with remote learning was just one task. Another challenge was that the work-life balance was totally disrupted, blurring the lines between family time and work hours.
By P.J. D'Annunzio
7 minute read
July 02, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
Siding With Cozen, Court Says Self-Defense Exception to Professional Conduct Rules Can Outweigh PrivilegeIn an apparent issue of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled in a Dragonetti Act lawsuit against Cozen O'Connor that the state's attorney conduct rules permit lawyers to disclose otherwise privileged documents into discovery in their own defense.
By P.J. D'Annunzio
3 minute read
July 01, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
In Overturning Obscenity Conviction, Court Says Text Messages Don't Constitute 'Obscene Material'A man convicted of obscenity for sending sexually explicit text messages to an unknown recipient has successfully argued that his behavior did not meet the legal definition of "obscene material."
By P.J. D'Annunzio
3 minute read
June 25, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
3rd Circuit Punts Questions of Medical Device Liability to Pa. Supreme CourtIn determining that state law is unresolved on two issues of medical device products liability, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has sent the issue to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for review.
By P.J. D'Annunzio
5 minute read
June 24, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
3rd Circ. Clarifies When Evidence From Flawed Warrants May Be AdmissibleIn a precedential decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that because a warrant for a man suspected of child molestation—which included an assumption that he likely possessed child pornography—was executed in good faith, the nearly 70,000 illegal images obtained by a police search should be admissible as evidence.
By P.J. D'Annunzio
3 minute read