August 17, 2022 | New Jersey Law Journal
The War on Independent ContractorsVery sophisticated adjudicatory authorities cannot even agree on what an 'employee' is. But we have adopted a legal scheme that subjects a business owner to being labeled a fraudster if she guesses wrong.
By Samuel J. Samaro
7 minute read
November 11, 2019 | New Jersey Law Journal
The Odyssey of Rudolph EisnerIn this era of per curium opinions and the predictable life cycle of a case from birth to split baby, it can be hard to find inspiration. As a corrective, or maybe just a nostalgic interlude, I offer the odyssey of one Rudolph Eisner, solo practitioner.
By Samuel J. Samaro
6 minute read
October 11, 2018 | New Jersey Law Journal
Nineteen HeadsOP-ED: Statistically speaking, what are the odds of becoming a Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court?
By Samuel J. Samaro
5 minute read
October 16, 2017 | New Jersey Law Journal
A Critique of the Unpublished Per Curiam OpinionOP-ED: A lot of important guidance is lost every year, and parties are receiving less appellate process than they deserve.
By Samuel J. Samaro
7 minute read
March 26, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal
Medical Leave Under the Discrimination LawsBy Samuel J. Samaro
11 minute read
November 04, 2005 | Law.com
Pregnancy Leave Ruling Misses the MarkNew Jersey's Supreme Court has ruled that an employer's refusal to extend leave for a woman experiencing complications from pregnancy didn't violate the state's Law Against Discrimination. It reached that conclusion by limiting its analysis to whether the employer's action constituted disparate treatment discrimination or created a disparate impact. The court, says Samuel Samaro, missed the real issue, of whether the plaintiff was disabled under the LAD and entitled to a leave as a reasonable accommodation.
By Samuel J. Samaro
10 minute read
November 04, 2005 | Corporate Counsel
Pregnancy Leave Ruling Misses the MarkNew Jersey's Supreme Court has ruled that an employer's refusal to extend leave for a woman experiencing complications from pregnancy didn't violate the state's Law Against Discrimination. It reached that conclusion by limiting its analysis to whether the employer's action constituted disparate treatment discrimination or created a disparate impact. The court, says Samuel Samaro, missed the real issue, of whether the plaintiff was disabled under the LAD and entitled to a leave as a reasonable accommodation.
By Samuel J. Samaro
10 minute read
October 17, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal
Pregnancy Leave Ruling Misses the MarkThe New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled that an employer's refusal to extend leave for a pregnant woman experiencing complications did not violate of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination.
By Samuel J. Samaro
10 minute read
Trending Stories