Filter This View

  • Marshall v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-10-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-22
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 1
    Judge: Jim Sharp Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-08-00734-CR

    Concurring opinionI write in concurrence to emphasize that any attempt by the trial court to "clarify" the notion of "beyond a reasonable doubt" for the venire could, depending upon the tone of voi

  • Unifund CCR Partners as Assignee of Citibank v. Carden

    Publication Date: 2010-05-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-30
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Jan P. Patterson, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-010-00060-CV

    MEMORANDUM OPINIONAppellant Unifund CCR Partners as assignee of Citibank filed notice of a rule 11 agreement between the parties of settlement. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 11. Pursuant to the terms of the

  • Ray Freeman Mcchristian v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-05-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-18
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1752-10, 1753-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b) and 68.4(i) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 c

  • Rodriguez-Flores v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-15
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-09-00433-CR

    ORDERAppellant's brief was originally due October 9, 2009. Counsel has requested and received four extensions of time to file the appellant's brief, ultimately extending the deadline to August 23,

  • In Re Hino Electric Power Company, Inc. and Hino Electric Holding

    Publication Date: 2010-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-03
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00803-CV

    ORDERRelators Hino Electric Power Company, Inc. and Hino Electric Holding Company, L.P. filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8, 52.10. We

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Bucks County Court Rules 2023

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Juan Reyes Rivera, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-05-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-25
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0635-11

    KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates f Appellate Procedure 68.5, because the petition exceeds 15 pages.The petition is struck. See

  • In Re Eduardo Rodriguez Hernandez

    Publication Date: 2012-11-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-11-02
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Jeff Rose, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-12-00720-CV

    M E M O R AN D U M OPINIONRelator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and G

  • Patten v. Kidd

    Publication Date: 2010-03-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-12
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-10-00051-CV

    ORDERDavid Christopher Kidd Appellee's Motion to Dismiss the Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction and Want of Prosecution is overruled in all aspects.Ordered.Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices P

  • Robert Lee Menefee v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1568-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the co

  • Texas State Board of Public Accountancy v. Bass

    Publication Date: 2010-07-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-09
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 03-10-00276-CV, 03-10-00277-CV & 03-10-00278-CV

    ORDERThe appellants filed an agreed motion to consolidate the appeals in cause numbers 03-10-00276-CV, 03-10-00277-CV, and 03-10-00278-CV for the purpose of record preparation, briefing, and argume