Filter This View

  • Eliso Xavier Nash, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NOS. PD-1744-10,, PD-1745-10,, PD-1746-10 & PD-1747-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTYKeasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of App

  • In Re the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-09-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-30
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Jeff Rose, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-12-00370-CV

    M E M O R AN D U M OPINIONRelator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and G

  • Raymond C. Hennigar v. Susan Cunningham

    Publication Date: 2011-11-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-11-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 14-10-00937-CV

    JUDGMENTThe Fourteenth Court of AppealsThis cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Susan Cunningham, signed June 29, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We h

  • In re Freier

    Publication Date: 2009-10-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-15
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2-09-342-CV

    ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGMEMORANDUM OPINION*fn1The court has considered Relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dism

  • Jason Mack v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00452-CR, NO. 03-10-00453-CR

    ORDERAppellant's counsel has filed his third motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief. We grant the motion and ORDER counsel to file appellant's brief no later than February 14, 2011.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Chester County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Charles Winton Land, Jr v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-08
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1560-10, PD-1561-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court

  • In the Interest of B.S., A Child

    Publication Date: 2013-01-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-01-04
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 11
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-12-00369-CV,, 11-13-00001-CV

    In The Eleventh Court of AppealsORDERIn Cause No. 11-12-00369-CV, appellant filed a notice of appeal and docketing statement in this court on December 31, 2012. On January 3, 2013, this co

  • Ex Parte Bradley Dale Emerson,

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-74,914-01

    Womack, J., not participating.ORDERPursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application fo

  • Mark Polansky and Landrah Polansky v. Pezhman Berenji and John Berenjy

    Publication Date: 2012-12-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-12-07
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Bob Pemberton, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-11-00592-CV

    C O N C U R R I N G OPINIONI agree with the majority that the trial court erred in purporting to grant summary judgment for appellees as to the Polanskys' c because the merits of those c

  • Alan Joel Geick, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1734-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN COUNTYKeasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of