• Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueen

    Publication Date: 2008-05-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-16
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Bob Pemberton, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 03-07-00249-CV

    OPINIONIn 1995, appellee Cletius Irvan won approximately $9 million in the Texas Lottery, to be paid in annual installments of around $450,000. Pursuant to an Arkansas court order that has been dom

  • Kelly v. Demoss Owners Association

    Publication Date: 2002-01-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-07
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Don H. Reavis Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-00-0589-CV

    Appellant Rosalind A. Kelly presents this appeal from a summary judgment that she take nothing against Demoss Owners Association and Association Management, Inc. (the Association) on her action for da

  • Castillo v. State

    Publication Date: 2002-02-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-02-19
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Brian Quinn, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-01-061-CR

    Roy Castillo (appellant) was convicted by a jury of murder. Through seven issues, he alleges that 1) the jury charge was improper, 2) by omitting an instruction on transferred intent viz the lesser in

  • In Re: Le

    Publication Date: 2011-03-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-03-03
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Tracy Christopher Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 14-11-00132-CV,, NO. 14-11-00156-CV.

    Emergency Motion for Stay Denied, Motion to Consolidate Granted, Petitions for Writ of Mandamus Denied, and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed March 3, 2011.ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGM A J O R I

  • Desai v. Chambers County Appraisal District

    Publication Date: 2012-08-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-07
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Kem Thompson Frost Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 14-11-00956-CV,, NO. 14-11-00957-CV

    Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 7, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals OPINION In this appeal we consider the impact under the "mailbox rule"

  • Richard G. Ortega v. Cach, LLC

    Publication Date: 2013-01-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-01-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Kem Thompson Frost Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 14-11-00768-CV

    Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed January 29, 2013.In The Fourteenth Court of AppealsD I S S E N T I N G OPINIONThis is an appeal from a judgment in a deb

  • In the Interest of M.C.G., A Child

    Publication Date: 2010-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-02
    Court: Tex. App. Dist.14
    Judge: Leslie B. Yates Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 14-09-00644-CV

    Rehearing Overruled, Affirmed, and Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing filed December 2, 2010.SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARINGAppellant moved for rehearing, contending that our opinion relied

  • Bank of Texas, N.A. v. Glenny

    Publication Date: 2013-06-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-18
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: JIM MOSELEY, JUSTICE
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-11-01478-CV

    On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 08-14408 Before Justices Moseley

  • Fleming v. Texas Coastal Bank of Pasadena

    Publication Date: 2002-01-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-17
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Scott Brister Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 14-00-01069-

    OPINIONThis is a suit by a victim of a swindle attempting to recoup his investment, not from the swindler, but from the swindler's bank. Finding no basis for doing so, we affirm.In March of 1997

  • Maples v. Muscletech, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2002-01-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-16
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-01-0471-CV

    ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY STAYIn the proceeding underlying this interlocutory appeal, appellants Scott Maples, his wife Rachel Maples, and TBA, Inc. (TBA) asked us to stay a temporary injunction gran