• Darryl Woodard, Appellant v. United States, Appellee.

    Publication Date: 2012-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-05-24
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-CF-1134

    Argued April 7, 2009Before WASHINGTON, Chief Judge, THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and FARRELL,*fn1 Senior Judge.A partly reconstituted division of the court

  • Shahid Turner v. United States

    Publication Date: 2011-08-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-08-25
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-CF-1444

    Argued February 17, 2011Before RUIZ and BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY,*fn1 Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.Shahid Turner appeals from his convictions for

  • Janet Stedman v. District of Columbia

    Publication Date: 2011-02-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-03
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-CT-586

    Submitted January 25, 2011Before THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and FERREN and FARRELL, Senior Judges.This appeal concerns the meaning of an ambiguous clause of a plea agreement by which appellant w

  • Robert A. Walden v. United States

    Publication Date: 2011-05-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-12
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-CF-297

    Argued March 15, 2011Before BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge, KRAMER,*fn1 Associate Judge, Retired, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.A jury found appellant gui

  • In Re andrew J. Kline,

    Publication Date: 2011-01-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-13
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-BG-1531

    Argued November 23, 2010Before RUIZ and FISHER, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.Respondent Kline, in the Hearing Committee's words, "committed a significant number of serious ethical

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Lancaster County & Berks County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In re L.M.

    Publication Date: 2010-10-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-30
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-FS-644

    Argued September 10, 2010Before THOMPSON and OBERLY, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.Appellant was adjudged delinquent after she assaulted with a dangerous weapon (ADW shod foot) a g

  • Mary Graham v. Lanier Associates

    Publication Date: 2011-05-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-12
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10-CV-675

    Argued December 7, 2010Before OBERLY, Associate Judge, KRAMER,*fn1 Associate Judge, Retired, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.Lanier Associates (Lanier) filed a

  • Foreman v. United States

    Publication Date: 2010-02-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-04
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-CF-1130

    Argued December 11, 2009Before BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.Appellant was charged with, among other things, armed robbery and possession of a firea

  • Doyle v. NAI Personnel, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-01
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Farrell, Senior Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 08-AA-1250 & 08-AA-1251

    Submitted March 23, 2010Before PRYOR, TERRY, and FARRELL, Senior Judges.These petitions for review present once again the issue of whether a claim for unemployment compensation was properly deni