Filter This View

  • Southard v. Temple University Hospital

    Publication Date: 2001-10-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-09-26
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 22 EAP 2000

    ARGUED: January 29, 2001OPINIONWe granted allocatur limited to the issue of whether the doctrine of informed consent requires surgeons to advise their patients of the Food and Drug Administratio

  • Erfer v. Commonwealth

    Publication Date: 2002-03-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-15
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14 MM 2002

    Application for Relief Pursuant to Section 726 of the Judicial Code.OPINIONThis opinion is filed in support of the per curiam order of this court dated February 15, 2002. That order dismissed th

  • Sell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    Publication Date: 2001-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-22
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 60 MAP 2000

    J-168-2000ARGUED: December 4, 2000OPINIONIn 77 P.S. �631, Pennsylvania's Workers' Compensation Act (the "Act"), 77 P.S. ��1 et seq., states that an employee must notify her employer of a work

  • Commonwealth v. Howard

    Publication Date: 2002-01-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-22
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 302 Capital Appe

    SUBMITTED: August 27, 2001OPINIONMelvin Howard ("Appellant") appeals from the dismissal of his second petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S. � 9541 et seq

  • Duttry v. Patterson

    Publication Date: 2001-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-22
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 69 M.D. App. Dkt

    J-180-2000ARGUED: December 5, 2000OPINIONWe granted allocatur in this matter to determine whether the Superior Court below impermissibly extended the scope of the doctrine of informed consent

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    Publication Date: 2001-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-19
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 61 and 62 M

    ARGUED: December 4, 2000OPINIONThe issues presented in this appeal involve (1) the eligibility of a person involuntarily committed as a condition of probation for workers' compensation benefits

  • In re Iulo

    Publication Date: 2001-02-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-02-20
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 560 Disc. Dkt. N

    J-142B-2000ARGUED: October 17, 2000OPINIONThis matter is before the court as a disciplinary enforcement proceeding. The specific context is a rule to show cause why respondent, Dennis J. Iulo

  • Commonwealth v. Klein

    Publication Date: 2001-10-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-10-04
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 19 MAP 2001

    SUBMITTED: April 17, 2001OPINIONThe issue presented in this case is whether the Superior Court properly quashed Appellant's appeal from the June 23, 1999 sentencing order on the basis that a lat

  • Pappas v. Asbel

    Publication Date: 2001-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-03
    Court: Pa. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Mr. Justice Cappy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 98 E.D. App. Dkt

    [J-158-2000]Remand from the United States Supreme CourtOPINIONBased on the principles the United States Supreme Court articulated in New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield