Filter This View

  • In Re: Henry

    Publication Date: 2011-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-08
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-2264

    UNPUBLISHEDSubmitted: January 10, 2011Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in thi

  • Francisco Tzunux v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General

    Publication Date: 2011-11-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-11-10
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-1471

    Not for Publication in West's Federal ReporterBefore Lipez, Selya and Howard, Circuit J

  • Marywood v. Vela

    Publication Date: 2001-08-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-03
    Court: Tex.
    Judge: Per Curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-0583

    On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Third District of TexasPetitioner's motion for rehearing is denied, the per curiam opinion issued in this case on May 3, 2001, is withdrawn,

  • Mary Louise Serafine v. Alexander Blunt; Ashley Blunt; Scott Lockhart; and Austin Drainage and

    Publication Date: 2012-12-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-12-13
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-12-00726-CV

    ORDERAppellant filed a motion asking us to stay the underlying proceeding pending the outcome of her appeal. Appellees have responded that they do not oppose the granting of the motion to sta

  • Richard Cisneros, Jr v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-11-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-10-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD 0927-09

    Meyers, j. dissented.We have determined that our decision to grant the appellant's petition was improvident. Therefore, the petition is dismissed.P

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    How to Recover Attorneys’ Fees in Texas 2024

    Authors: Trey Cox, Jason Dennis

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Myron Bishop Head v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-05-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-19
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00414-CR

    ORDERAppellant's counsel has filed his third motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief. We grant the motion and ORDER counsel to file appellant's brief no later than June 13, 201

  • Hatton v. Texas Dep't of Family and Protective Services

    Publication Date: 2010-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-03
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-10-00638-CV

    ORDERThe court reporter has filed a request for an extension of time to file the record, which was originally due on September 25, 2010. We grant the request, extending the deadline until December

  • David C. v. Joel

    Publication Date: 2011-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-27
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-7345

    UNPUBLISHEDSubmitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 27, 2011Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Unpublished opinions are not b

  • Kenneth Ray Green v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1071-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) & 9.3(b), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the co

  • In Re Tasha Key

    Publication Date: 2010-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-03
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00802-CV

    ORDERRelator's motion for emergency relief is granted. Accordingly, the visitation schedule described in the trial court's order dated November 29, 2010 is stayed pending this Court's disposition o