Filter This View

  • In Re Curtis Jerrells

    Publication Date: 2011-05-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-05-12
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-11-00289-CV

    M E M O R AN D U M OPINIONThe petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton an

  • In re Pendleton

    Publication Date: 2008-05-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-20
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-08-00392-CV

    Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Opinion filed May 20, 2008.ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUSMEMORANDUM OPINIONOn May 12, 2008, relator, Roderick Ray Pendleton aka Derald Ray Co

  • In re Stanley

    Publication Date: 2009-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-29
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-BG-1209

    BDN: 240-09BEFORE: Glickman and Thompson, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.ORDEROn consideration of petitioner, Denise R. Stanley's petition for reinstatement, this court's opinion

  • United v. Xavier

    Publication Date: 2011-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-19
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-6868

    UNPUBLISHEDSubmitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Unpublished opinions are not binding

  • Matthew v. Neadie L.

    Publication Date: 2011-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-09
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-1689

    UNPUBLISHEDSubmitted: January 20, 2011Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cir

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024

    Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Ex Parte Monroe Webb, Applicant

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-37,223-02

    ORDERThis is an application for a writ of habeas corpus that was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07, Section 3, of the Texas Code

  • Parhat v. Gates

    Publication Date: 2008-07-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-30
    Court: DC Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-1397 September Term 2007

    CSRT-320BEFORE: Sentelle, Chief Judge, and Garland and Griffith, Circuit Judges.ORDERUpon consideration of the court's order filed June 20, 2008, directing respondents to show cause why the c

  • Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Simone

    Publication Date: 2002-02-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-02-06
    Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. A-2 Septembe

    Argued January 14, 2002The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge King's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 340 N.J. Super. 19 (2001).CHIEF JUSTICE PO

  • Yedidiyah Hawkins v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1189-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5 because the petition exceeds 15 pages.The petition is struck. See Rule o

  • Ex Parte Mickey Ray Minter,

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-15
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-72,801-01

    ORDERPursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte