Filter This View

  • James E. v. Michelin North America, Incorporated

    Publication Date: 2011-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-25
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-2025

    UNPUBLISHEDSubmitted: January 18, 2011Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this ci

  • In re Freier

    Publication Date: 2009-10-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-15
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2-09-342-CV

    ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGMEMORANDUM OPINION*fn1The court has considered Relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dism

  • Harclay House Associates v. City of East Orange

    Publication Date: 2001-10-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-10-09
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-4601-99T5

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONArgued: September 12, 2001On appeal from a final judgment of the Tax Court of New Jersey.Harclay House Associates (Harclay) a

  • Jason Mack v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00452-CR, NO. 03-10-00453-CR

    ORDERAppellant's counsel has filed his third motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief. We grant the motion and ORDER counsel to file appellant's brief no later than February 14, 2011.

  • Charles Winton Land, Jr v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2010-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-08
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1560-10, PD-1561-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of Pennsylvania Family Law Forms, Fourth Edition

    Authors: Joseph S. Britton

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In the Interest of B.S., A Child

    Publication Date: 2013-01-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-01-04
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 11
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-12-00369-CV,, 11-13-00001-CV

    In The Eleventh Court of AppealsORDERIn Cause No. 11-12-00369-CV, appellant filed a notice of appeal and docketing statement in this court on December 31, 2012. On January 3, 2013, this co

  • Ex Parte Bradley Dale Emerson,

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. WR-74,914-01

    Womack, J., not participating.ORDERPursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application fo

  • Saunders v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-12-06
    Court: Tx. App. Dist.13
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NUMBER 13-01-438

    On appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.OPINIONAppellant, JAMES ROBERT SAUNDERS, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of Victoria Count

  • Schundler v. Paulsen

    Publication Date: 2001-05-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-10
    Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-101 September

    Submitted May 10, 2001 –On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at ____ N.J.Super. _____ (2001).This matter has come before the Court on an app

  • TXU Electric Delivery Co. v. Wojewski

    Publication Date: 2011-01-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-10
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-09-01457-CV

    DISMISSMEMORANDUM OPINIONBefore Justices O'Neill, Francis, and Murphy.The Court has before it the parties' agreed motion to dismiss appeal. In the motion, the parties state they have reached