Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
796 results for '* topic:"Constitutional Law"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2017-09-19
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry: Advertising | State and Local Government | Non–Profit
Date Filed: 2017-09-19
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding Before: Dorothy W. Nelson and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and J. Michael Seabright,* Chief District Judge.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard P. Bress (argued), Melissa Arbus Sherry, and Michael E. Bern, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C.; James K. Lynch and Marcy C. Priedeman, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Francisco, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant American Beverage Association.
for defendant: Christine Van Aken (argued), Jeremy M. Goldman, and Wayne Snodgrass, Deputy City Attorneys; Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney; Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, California; for Defendant-Appellee.
Case Number: No. 16-16072 No. 16-16073
Mandated inclusion of health warning on billboard advertising for sugar-sweetened beverages offends advertisers' First Amendment rights (Ikuta, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-09-19
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Date Filed: 2017-09-19
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding Before: Carlos T. Bea and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and William Q. Hayes,* District Judge.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Athan E. Tramountanas (argued), Short Cressman & Burgess PLLC, Seattle, Washington; Lisa Ann Battalia, Law Office of Lisa Ann Battalia, Bethesda, Maryland; for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
for defendant: Gregory Colin Narver (argued), Assistant City Attorney; Peter S. Holmes, City Attorney; City Attorney's Office, Seattle, Washington; for Defendants-Appellees.
Case Number: No. 14-35970
City's "use of force" policy did not unconstitutionally burden police officers' Second Amendment right to use firearms in self-defense (Hayes, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-08-28
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Constitutional Law | Employment Litigation
Industry: Education
Date Filed: 2017-08-23
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rebekah Ricketts (argued) and Benjamin D. Wilson, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Dallas, Texas; Daniel S.J. Nowicki, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, California; Jeffrey Paul Helsdon, Oldfield & Helsdon PLLC, Fircrest, Washington; Hiram Sasser and Michael Berry, First Liberty Institute, Plano, Texas; Anthony J. Ferate, Ferate PLLC, Edmond, Oklahoma; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
for defendant: Michael B. Tierney (argued) and Paul Correa, Tierney & Blakney P.C., Seattle, Washington, for Defendant-Appellee.
Case Number: No. 16-35801
High school football coach had no First Amendment right to engage in public prayer at football games (M.D. Smith, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-08-22
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Date Filed: 2017-08-22
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Frederic Block,* District Judge.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth J. McKenna (argued), Reno, Nevada, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
for defendant: Joseph F. Tartakovsky (argued), Deputy Solicitor General; Brandon R. Price, Deputy Attorney General; Cameron P. Vandenberg, Supervising Senior Deputy Attorney General; Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, Carson City, Nevada, for Defendant-Appellant.
Case Number: No. 15-16571
Ban on highway patrol officers' communications with public violated First Amendment by imposing impermissible prior restraint (Berzon, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-08-16
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry: Advertising
Date Filed: 2017-08-16
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Susan Illston, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Susan P. Graber and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges, and Consuelo B. Marshall,* District Judge.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael F. Wright (argued), Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
for defendant: James M. Emery (argued) and Victoria Wong, Deputy City Attorneys; Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney; Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, California; for Defendant-Appellee.
Case Number: No. 17-15909
City ordinance properly distinguished between commercial and non-commercial signage (Graber, J.)
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2017-07-17
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Civil Rights
Industry: Federal Government | Technology Media and Telecom
Date Filed: 2017-07-17
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, N. Randy Smith, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew Crocker (argued), Nathan Cardozo, Lee Tien, Kurt Opsahl, Jennifer Lynch, David Greene, Cindy Cohn, and Aaron Mackey, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, California; Richard Wiebe, Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe, San Francisco, California; for Petitioner-Appellants.
for defendant: Lewis S. Yelin (argued), Scott R. McIntosh, and Douglas N. Letter, Appellate Staff; Brian Stretch, United States Attorney; Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for Respondent-Appellee.
Case Number: No. 16-16067 No. 16-16081 No. 16-16082
Law authorizing imposition of nondisclosure requirement on recipient of national security letter does not violate First Amendment (Ikuta, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-07-14
Practice Area: Trusts and Estates | Constitutional Law | Family Law
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Financial Services and Banking | State and Local Government
Date Filed: 2017-07-14
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding Before: Eugene E. Siler, Jr.,*A. Wallace Tashima, and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Josh A. Lazar (argued), The Geraci Law Firm, Irvine, California, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant.
for defendant: Timothy James Ryan (argued), Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; Jared M. Toffer, Finlayson Toffer Roosevelt & Lilly LLP, Irvine, California; Charles W. Wirken, Gust Rosenfeld PLC, Phoenix, Arizona; for Defendant-Counter-Defendant-Appellee.
Case Number: No. 15-15078
Application of Arizona's revocation-on-divorce statute did not violate Contracts Clause (Siler, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-07-07
Practice Area: Employment Litigation | Constitutional Law | Government
Industry: State and Local Government
Date Filed: 2017-06-13
Court: C.A. 4th
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Corey W. Glave for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
for defendant: Ferguson, Praet & Sherman, G. Craig Smith and Anthony M. Snodgrass for Defendants and Respondents.
Case Number: No. G053126
Officers had no reasonable expectation of privacy in comments made at scene of narcotics raid (Fybel, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-06-28
Practice Area: Criminal Law | Constitutional Law
Industry: Education
Date Filed: 2017-06-26
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Shawn McGahey Webb, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Noah P. Hill, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
for defendant: Wayne C. Tobin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Case Number: No. B271396
No equal protection violation in not requiring district attorneys' petitions for revocation of parole to be accompanied by same written reports required for supervising agencies (Hoffstadt, J.)
Publication Date: 2017-06-28
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry: Health Care
Date Filed: 2017-06-27
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, A. Wallace Tashima, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen A. Tuggy (argued) and Kelly S. Biggins, Locke Lord LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
for defendant: Erin B. Bernstein (argued) and Matthew Goldberg, Deputy City Attorneys; Yvonne R. Meré, Chief of Complex and Affirmative Litigation; Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney; Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, California; for Defendants-Appellees.
Case Number: No. 15-15434
San Francisco's Pregnancy Information Disclosure and Protection Ordinance not unconstitutional (D.W. Nelson, J.)
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read
