Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates
P.C.
75 Ponce De Leon Ave NE Ste 101
Atlanta,
GA 30308(470) 294-1674
www.garymartinhays.com
By Lisa Willis | January 13, 2025
"This is a new low, a new level of outrage, and it makes me sick," said David Bianchi.
By Bruce J. Bergman | January 13, 2025
The decision in ‘Cruz v. Bank of New York Mellon’ calls attention to the subject of judicial estoppel and raises, as the title recites, a grand, perhaps exquisite irony.
By Colleen Murphy | January 9, 2025
“That decision is not binding on us, and we disagree with the Third Circuit's conclusion regarding New Jersey law,” Judge Robert J. Gilson said.
By Aleeza Furman | January 8, 2025
The rule upends a longstanding practice in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas of conducting civil jury selection under the supervision of court staff rather than the judge. While some in the legal community have questioned the necessity of the requirement, others have applauded the change.
By Matthew D. Parrott and Rakelle Shapiro | January 8, 2025
A discussion of two recent decisions, Matter of Barons Media v. Shapiro Legal Group, Peerenboom v. Marvel Entertainment, which have helped clarify that the term “expenses” as used in CPLR 3122(d) encompasses the reasonable attorney fees incurred by a non-party subpoena recipient.
By Shveta Kakar | January 8, 2025
Fox Rothschild partner Shveta Kakar discusses New York State Second Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirming New York's "special interest beneficiary standing rule," which limits the ability to challenge actions of charitable corporations to the State Attorney General.
By Lisa Willis | January 7, 2025
The Florida-based carrier, which previously faced eviction, filed for Chapter 11 protection.
By Scott Mollen | January 7, 2025
Scott Mollen discusses “Versace v. Robinson, “957 Park Avenue LLC v. Ordonez,” and “Zara Realty Holding Corp. v. People.”
By Allison Dunn | January 3, 2025
"The fact that attorneys' fees can quickly exceed the value of disputes is both a sad fact of litigation and also precisely the reason that attorneys' fees for unreasonable and bad faith litigation are awarded," said U.S. District Judge April M. Perry, noting the Seventh Circuit recognized in Wisconsin v. Hotline Industries that "'improper removal prolongs litigation (and jacks up fees).'"
By Riley Brennan | January 3, 2025
"Rule 26 of our Rules of Civil Procedure allow a party to seek documents in the possession of the adverse party; it does not generally require the adverse party to pay for any said documents to be translated into the English language," the court said. "In other words, there is no duty to produce documents that do not exist."
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is accepting applications from all qualified persons for the position of Federal Pu...
