Court Upholds Unsigned Contracts
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a ruling that a 10-page letter to Gulfstream Aerospace sent to its employees that placed limits on employees' rights to sue the company is an enforceable contract. On July 15, 2005, Gulfstream Aerospace sent the letter to all of the...
December 31, 2005 at 07:00 PM
2 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a ruling that a 10-page letter to Gulfstream Aerospace sent to its employees that placed limits on employees' rights to sue the company is an enforceable contract.
On July 15, 2005, Gulfstream Aerospace sent the letter to all of the employees at its Savannah, Ga. facility. The letter required workers to take any complaints to arbitration rather than sue the company. Employees were not required to sign the letter but were required to accept its terms if they wanted to keep working for the company. In addition to mailing the letters, Gulfstream also posted the notices on 13 bulletin boards throughout the Savannah facility.
The letter stated that, “The DRP (dispute resolution policy) will become the exclusive procedure to resolve covered workplace disputes–so you should carefully read the enclosed brochure. This policy, which will become effective on August 1, 2002, will be a condition of continued employment. All covered claims will be subject to this DRP at that time.”
In 2002, 200 Gulfstream employees filed suit claiming that the company violated federal labor laws. Gulfstream argued the court should dismiss the suit because the employees gave up their rights to sue when they continued to work after receiving the letter. The court agreed with Aerospace, ruling the employees must go to arbitration.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2023/10/Businessman-juggling-business-icons-767x633.jpg)
![Starbucks Sues Ex-Executive to Recover $1M Signing Bonus Starbucks Sues Ex-Executive to Recover $1M Signing Bonus](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2024/03/Starbucks-Sign-767x633.jpg)
!['Not Last Week’s SEC': Regulatory Agency Creates Crypto Task Force 'Not Last Week’s SEC': Regulatory Agency Creates Crypto Task Force](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cd/ff/f95f99784a48b290efe529fd1d42/securities-and-exchange-commission-building-sec-2014-08-357358-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 2Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 3Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 4‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
- 5Litera Acquires Workflow Management Provider Peppermint Technology
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250