Activists Dig Up Old Mining Law
A group of Colorado natives and environmentalists are trying to revive a 2004 lawsuit against mining company Phelps Dodge Corp., and the decision could affect the way private mining companies purchase public land. The town of Crested Butte, Colo., Gunnison County and the High Country Citizens Alliance argued before a...
February 28, 2006 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
A group of Colorado natives and environmentalists are trying to revive a 2004 lawsuit against mining company Phelps Dodge Corp., and the decision could affect the way private mining companies purchase public land.
The town of Crested Butte, Colo., Gunnison County and the High Country Citizens Alliance argued before a three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Jan. 9 that a third party has the right to challenge the sale of public lands to private companies.
The crux of the issue is an 1872 mining law, which offers land and all patenting rights at $5 an acre, provided that the buyer prove that the mine will be profitable in the current market.
The High Citizens Alliance claims that a mining company can't prove profitability because molybdenum prices plummeted in the early 1980s and have not recovered since.
The groups argue that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) violated federal law when they issued patents for 155 acres of public land to Mt. Emmons Mining Co., a subsidiary of Phelps Dodge, in April 2004.
However, in 2004 the court found that the 1872 law prevents third parties from challenging such grants unless they have a competing claim to ownership. In the recent arguments, the Colorado groups are arguing that the mining law doesn't exclude third parties and a 1946 law allowing judicial review of federal agency decisions gives them a right to challenge the initial sale.
A group of Colorado natives and environmentalists are trying to revive a 2004 lawsuit against mining company Phelps Dodge Corp., and the decision could affect the way private mining companies purchase public land.
The town of Crested Butte, Colo., Gunnison County and the High Country Citizens Alliance argued before a three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Jan. 9 that a third party has the right to challenge the sale of public lands to private companies.
The crux of the issue is an 1872 mining law, which offers land and all patenting rights at $5 an acre, provided that the buyer prove that the mine will be profitable in the current market.
The High Citizens Alliance claims that a mining company can't prove profitability because molybdenum prices plummeted in the early 1980s and have not recovered since.
The groups argue that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) violated federal law when they issued patents for 155 acres of public land to Mt. Emmons Mining Co., a subsidiary of Phelps Dodge, in April 2004.
However, in 2004 the court found that the 1872 law prevents third parties from challenging such grants unless they have a competing claim to ownership. In the recent arguments, the Colorado groups are arguing that the mining law doesn't exclude third parties and a 1946 law allowing judicial review of federal agency decisions gives them a right to challenge the initial sale.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
- 2NY Inspector General Announces Attorneys Hired to Lead Upstate Region and Gaming
- 3Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 4Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 5Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250