U.S. Chamber of Commerce Urges Changes in SEC Enforcement Practices
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is taking aim at SEC practices it views as unfair to corporate America. In a report issued March 9, the chamber criticized what it called "an overly punitive approach to enforcement" and made 15 recommendations for changes it said would be beneficial to businesses, investors,...
March 10, 2006 at 06:56 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is taking aim at SEC practices it views as unfair to corporate America.
In a report issued March 9, the chamber criticized what it called “an overly punitive approach to enforcement” and made 15 recommendations for changes it said would be beneficial to businesses, investors, taxpayers and the SEC itself.
The key recommendation calls for appointment of an advisory committee to study enforcement processes and discover the reasons for a wave of recent cases in which administrative law judges and courts have been critical of the SEC's legal and factual analyses. Other recommendations include:
- Further clarifying standards for seeking fines against public companies for securities law violations caused by individual employees
- Making clear that companies do not have to waive attorney-client privilege in order to be viewed as cooperative in its investigations
- Stopping the practice of imposing fines on corporations for perceived lack of cooperation
The report was compiled by David Andrews, retired SVP for government affairs, general counsel and secretary for PepsiCo, Inc., and Bruce Hiler, chair of the Securities and Financial Institutions Regulation Department at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft.
“Sound regulation and enforcement are needed to ensure that our capital markets remain accessible, competitive and free of bad actors,” Chamber President and CEO Tom Donohue said in a statement. “While the SEC has made significant progress in providing more transparent guidelines to determine corporate penalties, its enforcement process is not always fair, consistently and appropriately applied, or respectful of due process.”
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is taking aim at SEC practices it views as unfair to corporate America.
In a report issued March 9, the chamber criticized what it called “an overly punitive approach to enforcement” and made 15 recommendations for changes it said would be beneficial to businesses, investors, taxpayers and the SEC itself.
The key recommendation calls for appointment of an advisory committee to study enforcement processes and discover the reasons for a wave of recent cases in which administrative law judges and courts have been critical of the SEC's legal and factual analyses. Other recommendations include:
- Further clarifying standards for seeking fines against public companies for securities law violations caused by individual employees
- Making clear that companies do not have to waive attorney-client privilege in order to be viewed as cooperative in its investigations
- Stopping the practice of imposing fines on corporations for perceived lack of cooperation
The report was compiled by David Andrews, retired SVP for government affairs, general counsel and secretary for
“Sound regulation and enforcement are needed to ensure that our capital markets remain accessible, competitive and free of bad actors,” Chamber President and CEO Tom Donohue said in a statement. “While the SEC has made significant progress in providing more transparent guidelines to determine corporate penalties, its enforcement process is not always fair, consistently and appropriately applied, or respectful of due process.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVisa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
Recent CEO Shooting Tragedy a Reminder for Corporate Risk Assessment and Incident Response Plans
7 minute readAlbertsons Gives Up on $25B Merger, Sues Kroger Seeking 'Billions of Dollars'
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-CFO of San Francisco Law Firms Pleads Guilty to $1.3M Embezzlement Scheme, DOJ Announces
- 2What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 3Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 4US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 5‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250