Decision of the Day
In an 8th Circuit employment discrimination case against Wal-Mart, the court upheld summary judgment for the retail behemoth despite a manager's egregious behavior.
April 30, 2006 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
On the now-defunct TV show “Arrested Development,” Scott Baio played an attorney named Bob Loblaw. After the character's appearance on the show, a legal blog penned by someone named “Robert Loblaw” surfaced.
However, the real-life Loblaw isn't a former star of “Happy Days,” but rather a female former assistant U.S. attorney who left the practice to be a stay-at-home mom. She started her blog, “Decision of the Day,” to track interesting decisions.
“Although there are a ton of legal blogs out there, there were none that provided detailed coverage of appellate decisions from all circuits,” she says. “I decided to try to fill that niche.”
And fill it she does.
Take the March 17 piece about an 8th Circuit employment discrimination case against Wal-Mart in which the court upheld summary judgment for the retail behemoth. Despite a manager's egregious behavior, including using the n-word, the appellate court “decided that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case of discrimination because the supervisor's comments weren't directly related to [the plaintiff's] termination,” according to the blog.
The entries are brief and always include the case name, number and links to court documents.
On the now-defunct TV show “Arrested Development,” Scott Baio played an attorney named Bob Loblaw. After the character's appearance on the show, a legal blog penned by someone named “Robert Loblaw” surfaced.
However, the real-life Loblaw isn't a former star of “Happy Days,” but rather a female former assistant U.S. attorney who left the practice to be a stay-at-home mom. She started her blog, “Decision of the Day,” to track interesting decisions.
“Although there are a ton of legal blogs out there, there were none that provided detailed coverage of appellate decisions from all circuits,” she says. “I decided to try to fill that niche.”
And fill it she does.
Take the March 17 piece about an 8th Circuit employment discrimination case against
The entries are brief and always include the case name, number and links to court documents.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRates Will Go Up (Again), But Here's Why Profitability Might Not Be Maximized
4 minute readFinancial Services Has a Trust Problem. Can GCs Help Right the Ship?
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 5A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
Who Got The Work
Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Mari Grace and Edmund Polubinski III have entered appearances for Australia-based Bitcoin-mining company Iris Energy and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the inadequacy of the company's site in Childress County, Texas, including it being 'ill-equipped' and unable to operate the company's proprietary design. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Peggy Kuo, is 1:24-cv-07046, Williams-Israel v. Iris Energy Limited et al.
Who Got The Work
Ryan S. Stippich of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren has entered an appearance for biopharmaceutical company Veru Inc. and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 30 in Wisconsin Western District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of June Ovadias, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that small sample sizes and other issues rendered it unlikely that the FDA would grant Emergency Use Authorization for the cancer drug candidate sabizabulin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge William M. Conley, is 3:24-cv-00676, Ovadias, June v. Steiner, Mitchell et al.
Who Got The Work
Holland & Knight partners Cynthia A. Gierhart and Thomas Willcox Brooke have entered appearances for Pakistani American Political Action Committee and Rao Kamran Ali in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 24 in District of Columbia District Court by Jackson Walker on behalf of Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee, accuses the defendants of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Pak-Pac' marks without authorization. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss, is 1:24-cv-02727, Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee v. Pakistani American Political Action Committee et al.
Who Got The Work
Lauren M. Rosenberg and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore have stepped in to represent Israel-based Oddity Tech Ltd. in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer, contends that the defendant made materially misleading statements regarding the capability of Oddity's AI technology and ongoing civil litigation, resulting in the artifical inflation of the market price of Oddity's securities. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06571, Hoare v. Oddity Tech Ltd. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250