Companies Replace Junior In-House Lawyers with Paralegals
In recent years general counsel have discovered that paralegals can do more than summarize depositions and Bates stamp documents. Smart GCs are using them in place of junior in-house lawyers--at least that's one way to interpret the results of two recent surveys conducted by Altman Weil. According to the legal...
July 11, 2006 at 08:00 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In recent years general counsel have discovered that paralegals can do more than summarize depositions and Bates stamp documents. Smart GCs are using them in place of junior in-house lawyers–at least that's one way to interpret the results of two recent surveys conducted by Altman Weil.
According to the legal consultancy's 2005 Law Department Management Benchmarks Survey, the ratio of paralegals to attorneys in legal departments has grown over the past four years. In 2002 this ratio was 29 for every 100 attorneys; three years later that number jumped by 6 to 35 for every 100 attorneys. Although that jump may seem small, experts expect it to continue to increase in the coming years.
“More and more, companies are asking themselves whether a paralegal might be able to fill a vacancy as opposed to automatically bringing in a lawyer to fill it,” says James Wilber, principal at Altman Weil. “Companies realize there is not much a properly trained and educated paralegal can't do.”
The driving force behind this shift is cost. According to Altman Weil's 2006 Annual Compensation Survey for Paralegals/Legal Assistants and Managers released June 29, the median salary for paralegals is $50,000, significantly less than the salary of even a junior-level attorney, which is approximately $200,000.
The survey also found the average annual bonus for paralegals is $2,000, with only 62.5 percent of in-house paralegals receiving a bonus. In addition, paralegals who work for legal departments make significantly less than their law firm counterparts, who earn 10.4 percent more in median total cash compensation.
“This shift in hiring more paralegals is just another example of how economic pressures are forcing lawyers to practice in smarter ways,” Wilber says.
Aside from appearing in court to represent a party and giving legal advice, paralegals can complete almost any other legal task, making them increasingly favorable replacements for what typically would be positions designated for in-house counsel.
For legal departments looking to fill such vacancies, especially those with restrictive budgets, Wilber suggests approaching the role of a paralegal with an open mind.
“Legal departments should start with a really broad definition of what a paralegal can do and then narrow it down from there,” he says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
White Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Trending Stories
- 1Starbucks Sues Ex-Executive to Recover $1M Signing Bonus
- 2Navigating AI Risks: Best Practices for Compliance and Security
- 320 New Judges? Connecticut Could Get Wave of Jurists
- 4Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 5‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250