Lousy Service
Client service should be second nature to lawyers. But some seem woefully out of touch with their clients' needs and concerns.
May 31, 2007 at 08:00 PM
9 minute read
Client service should be second nature to lawyers. But some seem woefully out of touch with their clients' needs and concerns. Take the case of SPS Technologies and Motorola–both of which appear to be victims of poor customer service.
The now-defunct SPS sued Motorola for $10 billion in 2002 for allegedly stealing trade secrets. The case ended in a hung jury in November 2006. SPS later discovered that Motorola had violated the judge's order barring expert witnesses from reading transcripts of other witnesses' testimonies.
Here's where it gets interesting.
SPS was represented by Willie Gary. If you go to www.williegary.com you can see a picture of him standing next to a pair of Bentleys in front of a mansion. A press release on his site announces his recent purchase of a 32-passenger Boeing 737. Christened “Wings of Justice II,” the plane is furnished with an 18-karat gold sink and a full-service kitchen.
After learning of Motorola's misdeeds (or at least the misdeeds of its outside firm–Shook Hardy & Bacon), Gary asked the judge to fine Motorola $100 million and pay his legal team's fees and expenses. Gary argued his fees alone were $24.5 million. The judge didn't fine Motorola, but did rule it should compensate the plaintiffs' lawyers $22.9 million.
The ugliness didn't stop there, though. According to the Chicago Tribune, Motorola's outside lawyer–Faith Gay, a partner at Quinn Emanuel– hugged Gary at the end of the hearing and exclaimed, “This is a huge win for Motorola. You walked out with peanuts.”
According to George Selby, Motorola's vice president of litigation, the company isn't happy with the outcome, but is happy with Gay's work. He says the quote was taken out of context. That's plausible. That said, however, I have a tough time believing that Motorola's CEO didn't cringe at that comment, especially after recently announcing a first-quarter net loss of $181 million.
To make sure your CEO doesn't cringe at the quality of the legal services you provide, our August issue will feature a list of client services best practices for in-house counsel.
But we need your help. We don't want it to be a list dreamed up by consultants who are far removed from the daily realities of managing a legal department. We want practices that actually work. So go to www.insidecounsel.com/editorial_survey and fill out our short survey about the client services practices that work for you. We will then use your suggestions to shape our article.
Client service should be second nature to lawyers. But some seem woefully out of touch with their clients' needs and concerns. Take the case of SPS Technologies and Motorola–both of which appear to be victims of poor customer service.
The now-defunct SPS sued Motorola for $10 billion in 2002 for allegedly stealing trade secrets. The case ended in a hung jury in November 2006. SPS later discovered that Motorola had violated the judge's order barring expert witnesses from reading transcripts of other witnesses' testimonies.
Here's where it gets interesting.
SPS was represented by Willie Gary. If you go to www.williegary.com you can see a picture of him standing next to a pair of Bentleys in front of a mansion. A press release on his site announces his recent purchase of a 32-passenger
After learning of Motorola's misdeeds (or at least the misdeeds of its outside firm–Shook Hardy & Bacon), Gary asked the judge to fine Motorola $100 million and pay his legal team's fees and expenses. Gary argued his fees alone were $24.5 million. The judge didn't fine Motorola, but did rule it should compensate the plaintiffs' lawyers $22.9 million.
The ugliness didn't stop there, though. According to the Chicago Tribune, Motorola's outside lawyer–Faith Gay, a partner at
According to George Selby, Motorola's vice president of litigation, the company isn't happy with the outcome, but is happy with Gay's work. He says the quote was taken out of context. That's plausible. That said, however, I have a tough time believing that Motorola's CEO didn't cringe at that comment, especially after recently announcing a first-quarter net loss of $181 million.
To make sure your CEO doesn't cringe at the quality of the legal services you provide, our August issue will feature
But we need your help. We don't want it to be
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250