GCs and Board Members Rank the Top 20 Firms
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom ranked as America's best corporate law firm in a survey of general counsel and directors of publicly traded companies.
June 13, 2007 at 12:12 PM
68 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom ranked as America's best corporate law firm in a survey of general counsel and directors of publicly traded companies. Corporate Board Member Magazine conducted the survey in conjunction with FTI Consulting. Survey respondents have named Skadden the top firm for seven consecutive years. This year, 802 directors and 235 GCs participated in the survey. Two newcomers to the list, Baker Botts and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, were ranked in the top 20, replacing Sidley Austin and Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison. A list of the 2007 rankings (and the rankings from 2006) follows:
The Top 20 Firms2006 Ranking
1. Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom (New York)1
2. Cravath Swaine & Moore (New York)2
3. Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz (New York)3
4. Sullivan & Cromwell (New York) 4
5. Davis Polk & Wardwell (New York)6
6. Jones Day (Cleveland) 5
7. Latham & Watkins (Los Angeles) 7
8. Baker & McKenzie (Chicago)11
9. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher (Los Angeles)10
10. Weil Gotshal & Manges (New York)9
11. Kirkland & Ellis (Chicago) 8
12. Fulbright & Jaworski (Houston)13
13. Shearman & Sterling (New York)12
14. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld (Washington, D.C.)15
15. O'Melveny & Myers (Los Angeles)19
16. Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett (New York) 17
17. Baker Botts (Houston) –
18. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (Palo Alto) 16
19. Covington & Burling (Washington, D.C.) 20
20. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr (Washington, D.C.)–
The Top 20 Firms2006 Ranking
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute read
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute read
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute read
Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 2Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
- 3Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
- 4Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
- 5Squire Patton Boggs Associate Among Those Killed in String of Methanol Poisonings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
