Bershad Pleads Guilty in Kickback Scheme
David J. Bershad, a former managing partner of securities class action law firm Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman, pleaded guilty July 9 to one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice and conspiracy to make false statements under oath. Bershad was indicted in May 2006 in connection to alleged kickback arrangements...
July 10, 2007 at 11:12 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
David J. Bershad, a former managing partner of securities class action law firm Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman, pleaded guilty July 9 to one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice and conspiracy to make false statements under oath. Bershad was indicted in May 2006 in connection to alleged kickback arrangements made by the firm, now known as Milberg Weiss.
As part of his plea agreement, filed in Los Angeles federal court, Bershad will pay $250,000 in fines, forfeit $7.75 million that he made from the arrangements and cooperate with prosecutors in their ongoing investigation. He also faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison, which will be determined in a sentencing hearing scheduled for June 2008.
Bershad, who joined Milberg Weiss in 1968, admitted to keeping a cache of pooled cash in his office safe that he secretly paid out in order to recruit and retain named plaintiffs for Milberg Weiss' suits. Federal prosecutors say Bershad and the firm paid more than $11 million to people so they would join class action and shareholder lawsuits. Prosecutors allege that over the past 20 years, the firm made more than $200 million from these arrangements in more than 150 suits.
Also named last May in the 105-page indictment were the firm, former partner Steven G. Schulman, an attorney who allegedly received kickbacks and a man who allegedly laundered money to facilitate the scheme. These defendants pleaded not guilty and are expected to face trial in January 2008. Milberg Weiss partner Melvyn Weiss and former partner William Lerach have not been indicted but are under federal investigation.
Last year, a former Milberg Weiss plaintiff pleaded guilty to accepting kickbacks, and another is expected to file a guilty plea July 10.
In a July 9 statement from a Milberg Weiss spokesman, the firm announced it had terminated its relationship with Bershad, who had been on a leave of absence since May 2006 and formally resigned in January, and officially announced its name change. In the statement, the firm said, “We remain confident that [Bershad's] actions will have no effect on the firm's commitment to its clients and its ongoing work to protect public shareholders and consumers.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250