Survey of In-House Attorneys Reveals Governance Trends
ACC/Corpedia study shows companies are spending more on compliance and ethics training and risk assessment.
July 18, 2007 at 07:34 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A survey of 458 in-house counsel conducted by the Association of Corporate Counsel and Corpedia Inc. revealed that in-house counsel continue to focus money and effort on compliance and risk assessment as their confidence in attorney-client privilege wanes.
More than 90 percent of participants in the 2007 Compliance Program and Risk Assessment Benchmarking Survey believe attorney-client privilege in government investigations is either non-existent or severely damaged, a 16 percent increase from the 2005 survey.
Sixty-seven percent of respondents said their companies spend up to $250,000 a year on ethics and compliance issues. Among organizations with 25,000 to 49,999 employees, 37 percent spend between $1 million and $5 million annually on ethics and compliance. An example of this spending is an increase in Code of Conduct training–more than 75 percent of companies now offer such training sessions.
The focus on compliance is company-wide. Nearly 44 percent of company boards received training on Federal Sentencing Guidelines compliance. Twenty-eight percent of the companies surveyed now have a dedicated ethics officer, and in 67 percent of those companies the ethics officer is not the same person as the chief compliance officer. Seventy percent of all companies surveyed now conduct periodic risk assessments, mainly internal document review and interviews with company leadership and employees, up 12 percent from the 2005 survey.
“With corporate scandals rocking boardrooms across the country, in-house counsel are taking steps to ensure they're not the subject of the next humiliating headline,” Corpedia CEO Alex Brigham said in a statement. “As a result, we are seeing significant spending on compliance programs, mandatory training and code of conduct reviews. Most importantly, companies are realizing that enforcing compliance and ethics involves every employee, at every level in the organization.”
Of the respondents, more than 45 percent were with publicly traded organizations, while 70 percent worked for companies who conduct business outside the U.S.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readInside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250