Import Hassles
The other day I went to the store to buy some toys for my 5-month-old daughter. As I searched through shelves overflowing with colorful plastic and furry objects, I did something I never do...
July 31, 2007 at 08:00 PM
3 minute read
The other day I went to the store to buy some toys for my 5-month-old daughter. As I searched through shelves overflowing with colorful plastic and furry objects, I did something I never do: I looked to see where the toys were made. Anything marked “Made in China” I set aside.
I am not a patriotic consumer. My aversion to products from China was a simple issue of safety.
It started with tainted pet food, which may have killed thousands of dogs and cats in the U.S. The culprit was melamine, a cheap chemical Chinese suppliers dumped into U.S.-bound pet food to inflate protein levels. That was followed by FDA warnings that toothpaste made in China contained diethylene glycol, a chemical used in antifreeze. Then the FDA announced that Robert's American Gourmet's “Veggie Booty” snack food contained seasoning contaminated with salmonella. Robert's imported that seasoning from China. The import debacle culminated with news that the much-loved Thomas & Friends wooden train toys were coated in lead paint. The company behind the products, Illinois-based RC2 Corp., ended up recalling 1.5 million of the toys–all of which were made in China.
A number of critics are placing the blame for these incidents on U.S. regulators and the Chinese government. That's not a bad place to start. But the real blame sits squarely with the U.S. companies that are importing and distributing these goods. I find it disturbing that a company such as RC2 would sell 1.5 million toys made in factories in China without ensuring these products were safe. If the blog chatter is any indication, RC2 is going to be buried in lawsuits for this mistake. On one site–www.usrecallnews.com–parents who bought these toys for their kids were boiling over in anger. Most said they would happily join any class action filed against the company.
Unfortunately, all of this comes at a time when the business community has made significant headway in convincing Americans that tort reform is good public policy. Corporate America also has made headway with the Supreme Court, which is slowly raising the bar on the standard needed to bring cases to trial.
In the face of the China import debacle, backdating scandals and other corporate misdeeds, the public may have a tough time believing that tort reform is really in their best interest. And they might be right. Although the plaintiffs' bar doesn't always play fair, it forces companies to think twice before cutting corners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250