Auto Manufacturers Lose Challenge to Strict Emissions Standards
A federal judge in Vermont denied automobile manufacturers injunctive relief from California vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards adopted by Vermont in 2005.
September 13, 2007 at 07:38 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A federal judge in Vermont denied automobile manufacturers injunctive relief from California vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards adopted by Vermont in 2005. Plaintiffs in the consolidated cases were GM, DaimlerChrysler, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, and several local car dealerships.
“Today's decision marks another important victory in the fight against global warming,” said Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in a statement. “California and other states that want to take aggressive action will no longer be blocked by those who stand in our way.”
Judge William K. Sessions III of the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont ruled in a 240-page opinion that the California standards are not pre-empted by federal regulations, finding that “through amendments to the [Clean Air Act], Congress has essentially designated California as a proving ground for innovation in emission control regulations.”
Sessions also found the greenhouse gas emissions standards would not present a burden beyond the automakers' ability to meet, citing manufacturers' progress in developing hybrid, clean diesel and powertrain technologies.
“History suggests that the ingenuity of the industry, once put in gear, responds admirably to most technological challenges,” Sessions said. “In light of the public statements of industry representatives, history of compliance with previous technological challenges, and the state of the record, the Court remains unconvinced automakers cannot meet the challenges of Vermont and California's [greenhouse gas] regulations.”
According to the Sierra Club, a defendant in the case, the California emissions standards have been adopted by at least 11 other states and could reduce vehicle greenhouse gas emissions by about 30 percent. Full implementation of the standards is set for 2016, though similar cases are pending in California and Rhode Island. In addition, the president could veto an Environmental Protection Agency waiver of federal pre-emption necessary for implementation in California.
“While the importance of this victory can scarcely be overstated,” said Sierra Club's Chief Climate Counsel David Bookbinder in a statement, “it's now time for the Bush Administration's EPA to get out of the way and grant California the waiver it and other states need in order to move forward with these landmark standards.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250