Companies Still Unprepared for Discovery According to Survey
A survey of 101 corporate counsel, legal department staff and law firm attorneys reveals companies are falling short on discovery preparedness.
September 27, 2007 at 09:34 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A survey of 101 corporate counsel, legal department staff and law firm attorneys reveals companies are falling short on discovery preparedness. According to the study–”In Pursuit of Proactive Litigation Preparedness: The Dawn of the Discovery-Ready Enterprise”–conducted by Oc? Business Services, a document process management service provider, 55 percent of corporate counsel believe their company is not well prepared to comply with a legal discovery request, while only 10 percent would consider their company very well prepared.
Among corporate counsel, 10 percent say they understand “very well” the 2006 e-discovery amendments to the FRCP, while 33 percent admit they don't understand the changes very well.
Despite this confusion, corporate counsel are clear on one thing: 57 percent believe their annual discovery costs will increase in the next year. Among large enterprises, 70 percent believe discovery costs will increase in the next year, with 20 percent expecting an increase of more than 25 percent.
The majority (60 percent) of respondents reported their organizations will use both in-house e-discovery experts as well as one or more outside service providers to deal with e-discovery. Twenty-four percent will establish e-discovery expertise exclusively within their organizations.
Across the board, a majority of respondents agreed that maintaining a records management program can reduce litigation costs (54 percent), reduce the amount of documents and ESI subject to discovery (62 percent), locate responsive materials more quickly (71 percent), lessen risk of penalties, sanctions and damage to reputation (73 percent) and facilitate implementing the duty to preserve (79 percent).
Although respondents see the value of a records program, only 45 percent of their organizations have a fully implemented records management program. Of those that do, just 8 percent believe their program addresses ESI very well. Among the 55 percent without a fully implemented records management program, 43 percent have no plans to introduce a program to their organization or don't know when and if they will. Fifty-six percent say their company intends to start a program within six months or in 2008.
Goals of the majority included creating a unified methodology that recognizes records management, compliance and paper discovery and e-discovery as interdependent processes. The majority also made it a goal to take a proactive approach to managing all forms of corporate records for compliance and discovery.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250