The Easy Button
This month legal technology expert Brett Burney discusses solutions that help in-house counsel retrieve and analyze e-mail.
November 12, 2007 at 07:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
General counsel are called upon to police and supervise an ever-broadening scope of electronic risks found in today's corporate environment. One of the most dangerous fissures exists within employee e-mail.
People will say in an e-mail what they'd never say in person or over the phone. This presents a monumental risk. Epic litigation strategies can be utterly destroyed by a few frisky words found in an ill-conceived e-mail.
General counsel can't be expected to walk the halls like a grade-school teacher, constantly reminding employees to watch what they say. And employees can only swallow so many training classes before they start to revolt. Wouldn't it be nice if there was an “easy button” you could push to gather employee e-mail for every compliance audit and litigation matter that comes across your desk without having to involve your overworked IT department?
Fortunately, there are some companies that are providing tools to help you proactively search, retrieve and preserve relevant employee e-mail along with attachments and other communications. The following is merely a sample of some of these “one-button” remedies.
- AXSOne (pronounced “access one”) has deep roots in data archiving. It's been helping large corporations retain records in electronic form for compliance purposes for almost 15 years. Archiving e-mails has become a natural extension of its technology.
In the past, AXSOne met with IT staff at large corporations, working with them to integrate an archiving workflow into the corporate information systems. Lately, AXSOne has found itself at the table with in-house counsel, answering questions on how to search, analyze and review all the corporate data (e-mail, instant messages, etc.) the software has collected.
Richard Hoffman, vice president of development, describes how companies use his solution. First, data is archived, organized and indexed. From there the solution can give in-house counsel the ability to search the archive for specific messages or e-mails relevant to a discovery request. In addition the solution allows automatic destruction policies to continue in place while relevant data is preserved for litigation purposes.
- Founded in 2003 InBoxer focuses on three areas: e-mail archiving, electronic discovery and content monitoring. The company's solution, Anti-Risk Appliance, may be better suited for general counsel serving small- and medium-sized companies that don't have the extensive regulatory and compliance requirements that a larger, public company might encounter.
The InBoxer Anti-Risk Appliance connects directly to e-mail servers so it can actively archive and monitor both inbound and outbound e-mail along with attachments. The solution captures and indexes e-mail in real time so that general counsel can preview e-mail within minutes.
Founder and CEO Roger Matus states that his solution appeals to GCs because it helps them prevent internal disputes from exploding into public lawsuits. Matus says InBoxer helps in-house counsel answer the question “Do I have a problem?” or, more specifically, “Did Bob send a harassing e-mail to Betty?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
GCs Jettisoning Zero-Based Budgeting in Quest to Be Nimble, More Efficient
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250