Data Destruction
Companies avoid security breaches by shredding old hardware.
November 30, 2007 at 07:00 PM
12 minute read
Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, made a prophetic observation in 1965. In what has become known as Moore's Law, he theorized that computers' storage capacity would double about every 18 months for the indefinite future. So far his theory seems to be holding true. Whereas several years ago a terabyte–1,000 gigabytes–hard drive was a thing of science fiction, it's now readily available.
As amazing as this technology is, it's created some unforeseen problems.
“Software manufacturers want to use as much of this capacity as possible, so newer versions of software require newer equipment,” says Robert Johnson, executive director of the National Association for Information Destruction (NAID), a trade association for information destruction service providers. “In turn this means companies have to dispose of more and more hardware to keep up.”
In many cases the IT department handles the disposal of old hardware. And that old hardware often ends up in landfills. The problem, though, is that the hard drives in the computers aren't properly erased and still house sensitive customer and company information–all of which has the potential of creating serious legal problems for the company.
“Clearly, within any company, someone such as the general counsel should look at hardware disposal, make a statement about policy and ensure employees comply and are aware of the legal reasons for doing it that way,” says Daniel Bayha, vice president and CFO of Back Thru The Future Computer Recycling Inc., a data destruction service provider. “The old practices just don't cut it any longer.”
Who's in Charge
It is these old practices that are getting companies into trouble. According to NAID, 60 percent to 75 percent of hard drives bought on the secondhand market still contain information. Many of these devices come from corporations that hand off old equipment to low-level IT personnel. These employees often donate the devices to schools, resell them to make extra cash for themselves or simply toss them in the garbage.
“Companies rarely charge the right person with handling hardware disposal,” says Angie Keating, vice president of compliance and security at Reclamere, a digital data destruction company. “The right person should be someone such as the CLO, the CEO or the CIO, but no one lower than those positions should be making those decisions.”
These executives should then work with the varying department heads to create a disposal plan for old equipment–whether it is a computer, a fax machine or PDA, all of which have hard drives that can contain documents or sensitive information.
“It shouldn't solely be the IT department that gets handed this responsibility,” says Bill Millican, director of IT and professional resources at ARMA International, a professional organization for records managers. “It should be a collaborative effort between IT, records management and in-house counsel.”
In some cases a company may also want to bring in outside help to dispose of used equipment. This is especially true in cases where a company doesn't have the resources to erase old hard drives, or in businesses that handle a lot of sensitive data such as financial institutions and insurers. The most common form of outside help are companies that shred old equipment.
The Garbage Men
Bayha's Back Thru The Future is one such company. His company specializes in the complete decimation of hardware. What arrives at his business as a set of intact hard drives leaves as a pile of shredded aluminum, thanks to a three-ton paper shredder on steroids.
“We take the material to the shredding machines and feed them in,” he says. “After we are done shredding the drives, we capture the material; we record the date, number of drives and weight; we take a photo of the waste and put it in an affidavit; the technician signs off on it; then we send it to an aluminum smelter where they smelt it, which we get records of as well.”
Complete and absolute destruction may be Bayha's business, but it's not the only service he provides. On the front end of every project, his company maintains a detailed audit trail of all incoming materials.
First, clients receive a steel container that can fit more than two dozen hard drives. The client records the manufacturer, model and serial number of every hard drive sent for destruction and then ships the container, noting its security tag to Back Thru The Future.
Next, Back Thru The Future photographs the container and its security tag and then takes inventory of the containers contents by manufacturer, make and serial number. It then e-mails all this documentation to the customer, which reviews and confirms it before Bayha's company destroys the hardware.
Bayha's customers include companies that operate in highly regulated industries, such as financial services.
“With any highly secure procedure you have to be redundant, so that if one method fails, the other one will accomplish what you need it to,” Bayha says.
Because Back Thru The Future makes most of its money off of selling the aluminum scrap, the service is cheap. Fees never go above $10 per device, and the company reduces this price when destroying in bulk. Back Thru The Future also will destroy old tapes and CD-ROMs for $.50 a pound.
Due Diligence
Back Thru The Future is only one of many companies that offer hardware destruction services. However, not all vendors are created equal. Johnson recommends that in-house counsel shop around and ask the right questions before contracting a vendor.
“The most important decision of disposing of IT equipment is really the qualifications of the company that you hire to do it,” he says. “Anyone in that business is going to say they can get rid of electronically stored information, but you have to do more than just believe what the vendor is telling you.”
Johnson recommends investigating the process the company uses to destroy hardware. The vendor should keep detailed audit trails that clients can use to ensure destruction is thorough and conduct criminal background checks on all employees to ensure hardware won't get stolen.
In addition someone from the company should visit the vendor to witness the destruction process. “Someone from the company should definitely visit the vendor the first couple times hardware is sent for destruction to find out for certain where the devices go and how the audit process works,” Millican says.
“Even after this, someone should make periodic, unannounced visits to witness what's going on.”
Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, made a prophetic observation in 1965. In what has become known as Moore's Law, he theorized that computers' storage capacity would double about every 18 months for the indefinite future. So far his theory seems to be holding true. Whereas several years ago a terabyte–1,000 gigabytes–hard drive was a thing of science fiction, it's now readily available.
As amazing as this technology is, it's created some unforeseen problems.
“Software manufacturers want to use as much of this capacity as possible, so newer versions of software require newer equipment,” says
In many cases the IT department handles the disposal of old hardware. And that old hardware often ends up in landfills. The problem, though, is that the hard drives in the computers aren't properly erased and still house sensitive customer and company information–all of which has the potential of creating serious legal problems for the company.
“Clearly, within any company, someone such as the general counsel should look at hardware disposal, make a statement about policy and ensure employees comply and are aware of the legal reasons for doing it that way,” says Daniel Bayha, vice president and CFO of Back Thru The Future Computer Recycling Inc., a data destruction service provider. “The old practices just don't cut it any longer.”
Who's in Charge
It is these old practices that are getting companies into trouble. According to NAID, 60 percent to 75 percent of hard drives bought on the secondhand market still contain information. Many of these devices come from corporations that hand off old equipment to low-level IT personnel. These employees often donate the devices to schools, resell them to make extra cash for themselves or simply toss them in the garbage.
“Companies rarely charge the right person with handling hardware disposal,” says Angie Keating, vice president of compliance and security at Reclamere, a digital data destruction company. “The right person should be someone such as the CLO, the CEO or the CIO, but no one lower than those positions should be making those decisions.”
These executives should then work with the varying department heads to create a disposal plan for old equipment–whether it is a computer, a fax machine or PDA, all of which have hard drives that can contain documents or sensitive information.
“It shouldn't solely be the IT department that gets handed this responsibility,” says Bill Millican, director of IT and professional resources at ARMA International, a professional organization for records managers. “It should be a collaborative effort between IT, records management and in-house counsel.”
In some cases a company may also want to bring in outside help to dispose of used equipment. This is especially true in cases where a company doesn't have the resources to erase old hard drives, or in businesses that handle a lot of sensitive data such as financial institutions and insurers. The most common form of outside help are companies that shred old equipment.
The Garbage Men
Bayha's Back Thru The Future is one such company. His company specializes in the complete decimation of hardware. What arrives at his business as a set of intact hard drives leaves as a pile of shredded aluminum, thanks to a three-ton paper shredder on steroids.
“We take the material to the shredding machines and feed them in,” he says. “After we are done shredding the drives, we capture the material; we record the date, number of drives and weight; we take a photo of the waste and put it in an affidavit; the technician signs off on it; then we send it to an aluminum smelter where they smelt it, which we get records of as well.”
Complete and absolute destruction may be Bayha's business, but it's not the only service he provides. On the front end of every project, his company maintains a detailed audit trail of all incoming materials.
First, clients receive a steel container that can fit more than two dozen hard drives. The client records the manufacturer, model and serial number of every hard drive sent for destruction and then ships the container, noting its security tag to Back Thru The Future.
Next, Back Thru The Future photographs the container and its security tag and then takes inventory of the containers contents by manufacturer, make and serial number. It then e-mails all this documentation to the customer, which reviews and confirms it before Bayha's company destroys the hardware.
Bayha's customers include companies that operate in highly regulated industries, such as financial services.
“With any highly secure procedure you have to be redundant, so that if one method fails, the other one will accomplish what you need it to,” Bayha says.
Because Back Thru The Future makes most of its money off of selling the aluminum scrap, the service is cheap. Fees never go above $10 per device, and the company reduces this price when destroying in bulk. Back Thru The Future also will destroy old tapes and CD-ROMs for $.50 a pound.
Due Diligence
Back Thru The Future is only one of many companies that offer hardware destruction services. However, not all vendors are created equal. Johnson recommends that in-house counsel shop around and ask the right questions before contracting a vendor.
“The most important decision of disposing of IT equipment is really the qualifications of the company that you hire to do it,” he says. “Anyone in that business is going to say they can get rid of electronically stored information, but you have to do more than just believe what the vendor is telling you.”
Johnson recommends investigating the process the company uses to destroy hardware. The vendor should keep detailed audit trails that clients can use to ensure destruction is thorough and conduct criminal background checks on all employees to ensure hardware won't get stolen.
In addition someone from the company should visit the vendor to witness the destruction process. “Someone from the company should definitely visit the vendor the first couple times hardware is sent for destruction to find out for certain where the devices go and how the audit process works,” Millican says.
“Even after this, someone should make periodic, unannounced visits to witness what's going on.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
2024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250