The Year in Review: #6. Going Green
"Green" was the word on everyone's lips this year, as Al Gore collected his Nobel Peace Prize for raising awareness of climate change, hybrid vehicle ...
November 30, 2007 at 07:00 PM
4 minute read
“Green” was the word on everyone's lips this year, as Al Gore collected his Nobel Peace Prize for raising awareness of climate change, hybrid vehicle sales surged up 49 percent from last year and the must-have accessory was a reusable cotton grocery bag that declared “I'm Not a Plastic Bag.”
In April the Supreme Court weighed in on the climate change issue, finding in Mass. v. EPA that not only does the EPA have the right under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from new vehicles, but that it must do so.
“The decision is more important for what it stands for rather than on its own,” says Adam Kahn, an environmental partner with Foley Hoag. “It is part of and indicative of a much larger and rapidly developing consensus: that carbon regulation, throughout the economy, is both inevitable and is coming in the near term.”
Currently states are leading the way, with the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative continuing to recruit Northeastern states to commit to reducing carbon dioxide emissions. In September a federal judge in Vermont ruled that state limits on greenhouse gas emissions from new vehicles–originating from California standards–were not pre-empted by federal law, clearing the way for enforcement in at least 10 other states that adopted the standards.
“One key issue is whether there will be a national program of carbon regulation or whether we'll continue to see what we've seen to date, which is individual states, regions and corporations taking the lead,” Kahn says. “There is increasing pressure on the federal government to take a lead to ensure consistent regulations and consistent policy. Time will tell whether that will be borne out.”
It appears the federal government is beginning to respond to that pressure. Sens. Joe Lieberman and John Warner in October introduced America's Climate Security Act of 2007, which seeks to reduce emissions from the power, industrial and transportation fuel sectors by 15 percent in 2020 and 70 percent by 2050.
“Green” was the word on everyone's lips this year, as Al Gore collected his Nobel Peace Prize for raising awareness of climate change, hybrid vehicle sales surged up 49 percent from last year and the must-have accessory was a reusable cotton grocery bag that declared “I'm Not a Plastic Bag.”
In April the Supreme Court weighed in on the climate change issue, finding in Mass. v. EPA that not only does the EPA have the right under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from new vehicles, but that it must do so.
“The decision is more important for what it stands for rather than on its own,” says Adam Kahn, an environmental partner with
Currently states are leading the way, with the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative continuing to recruit Northeastern states to commit to reducing carbon dioxide emissions. In September a federal judge in Vermont ruled that state limits on greenhouse gas emissions from new vehicles–originating from California standards–were not pre-empted by federal law, clearing the way for enforcement in at least 10 other states that adopted the standards.
“One key issue is whether there will be a national program of carbon regulation or whether we'll continue to see what we've seen to date, which is individual states, regions and corporations taking the lead,” Kahn says. “There is increasing pressure on the federal government to take a lead to ensure consistent regulations and consistent policy. Time will tell whether that will be borne out.”
It appears the federal government is beginning to respond to that pressure. Sens. Joe Lieberman and John Warner in October introduced America's Climate Security Act of 2007, which seeks to reduce emissions from the power, industrial and transportation fuel sectors by 15 percent in 2020 and 70 percent by 2050.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250