Automakers Denied in Challenge to California Emissions Standards
A federal judge in California has dismissed a suit from automakers that challenged the state's limits on greenhouse gas emissions from cars.
December 14, 2007 at 11:24 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A federal judge in California has dismissed a suit from automakers that challenged the state's limits on greenhouse gas emissions from cars. The Dec. 12 ruling comes in response to a 2004 lawsuit filed by auto industry trade organizations.
Sixteen states have adopted California's greenhouse gas emissions regulations, and if the laws go forward automakers providing cars to those states–which represent nearly half the country's population–would have to cut emissions from cars starting with 2009 models.
Vermont, one of the states to adopt California's regulations, fought off a similar suit from automakers in September. In April, the Supreme Court ruled that under the Clean Air Act, the EPA has authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles.
The law would be enforced only if the EPA approves a waiver that would allow California to pre-empt federal clean-air requirements. President Bush has rejected a nationwide standard for greenhouse gas emissions and backs voluntary efforts from automakers.
“Today's decision marks another important victory in the fight against global warming,” said California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in a Dec. 12 statement. “California and other states will prevail in our goal to take aggressive action on climate change.”
Last year Schwarzenegger signed the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which calls for the reduction of carbon emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2050.
A federal judge in California has dismissed a suit from automakers that challenged the state's limits on greenhouse gas emissions from cars. The Dec. 12 ruling comes in response to a 2004 lawsuit filed by auto industry trade organizations.
Sixteen states have adopted California's greenhouse gas emissions regulations, and if the laws go forward automakers providing cars to those states–which represent nearly half the country's population–would have to cut emissions from cars starting with 2009 models.
Vermont, one of the states to adopt California's regulations, fought off a similar suit from automakers in September. In April, the Supreme Court ruled that under the Clean Air Act, the EPA has authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles.
The law would be enforced only if the EPA approves a waiver that would allow California to pre-empt federal clean-air requirements. President Bush has rejected a nationwide standard for greenhouse gas emissions and backs voluntary efforts from automakers.
“Today's decision marks another important victory in the fight against global warming,” said California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in a Dec. 12 statement. “California and other states will prevail in our goal to take aggressive action on climate change.”
Last year Schwarzenegger signed the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which calls for the reduction of carbon emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2050.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250