Greener Printing
To read more about how technology helps attorneys reduce paper output, click here. Imagine a world where documents never had to be printed. Users could ...
March 31, 2008 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
To read more about how technology helps attorneys reduce paper output, click here.
Imagine a world where documents never had to be printed. Users could just go into the document management system, pull up a Word file and read it from their screens. And now think of the cost savings and the environmental benefits of such a program. Companies wouldn't have to spend money on paper, and paper manufacturers would have to greatly reduce their output due to dwindling demand.
Alas such a world doesn't exist, nor will it anytime soon. That's because sometimes a digital copy just can't rival a hardcopy. Whether you're on the go or just prefer reading from paper rather than a screen, there are definite advantages to printing documents. But just because you're printing paper doesn't mean you still can't be environmentally conscious. There's software on the market that can help you and your company decrease the amount of wasted paper from printing.
GreenPrint Technologies offers a patent-pending technology that can intelligently detect when a page of a document is extraneous and will automatically withhold it from printing. For example, everyone has printed an item from the Web only to have the last printed page reveal merely a URL or a banner ad. GreenPrint's software can automatically detect this and withhold this last page from printing.
Although it sounds like a minor benefit, reducing wasted paper over time can result in huge savings. On its Web site, printgreener.com, GreenPrint provides enterprises with a savings calculator, which estimates the savings a company can reap by using its product based on the number of employees. For example, according to the calculator, if a company has 1,000 employees, it can expect to save roughly $90,000 annually, reduce its paper output by nearly 1.5 million pages and save about 156 trees.
To read more about how technology helps attorneys reduce paper output, click here.
Imagine a world where documents never had to be printed. Users could just go into the document management system, pull up a Word file and read it from their screens. And now think of the cost savings and the environmental benefits of such a program. Companies wouldn't have to spend money on paper, and paper manufacturers would have to greatly reduce their output due to dwindling demand.
Alas such a world doesn't exist, nor will it anytime soon. That's because sometimes a digital copy just can't rival a hardcopy. Whether you're on the go or just prefer reading from paper rather than a screen, there are definite advantages to printing documents. But just because you're printing paper doesn't mean you still can't be environmentally conscious. There's software on the market that can help you and your company decrease the amount of wasted paper from printing.
GreenPrint Technologies offers a patent-pending technology that can intelligently detect when a page of a document is extraneous and will automatically withhold it from printing. For example, everyone has printed an item from the Web only to have the last printed page reveal merely a URL or a banner ad. GreenPrint's software can automatically detect this and withhold this last page from printing.
Although it sounds like a minor benefit, reducing wasted paper over time can result in huge savings. On its Web site, printgreener.com, GreenPrint provides enterprises with a savings calculator, which estimates the savings a company can reap by using its product based on the number of employees. For example, according to the calculator, if a company has 1,000 employees, it can expect to save roughly $90,000 annually, reduce its paper output by nearly 1.5 million pages and save about 156 trees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRecent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
- 2How Lower Courts Are Interpreting Justices' Decision in 'Muldrow v. City of St. Louis'
- 3Phantom Income/Retained Earnings and the Potential for Inflated Support
- 4Should a Financially Dependent Child Who Rejects One Parent Still Be Emancipated?
- 5Advising Clients on Special Needs Trusts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250