Paperless Progress
Technology helps legal departments reduce paper output.
March 31, 2008 at 08:00 PM
11 minute read
ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: To read more about how technology can reduce paper waste, click here.
Many lawyers believe the nature of their profession necessitates the hoarding of paper–a lot of paper–a misconception that through time has made them the enemy of tree
Matt Den Ouden used to belong to this school of thought. A national director of CT Tymetrix, a provider of matter management technologies, Den Ouden has worked side-by-side with legal departments and law firms for about 15 years and was shocked at the sheer volume of paper lawyers forced their companies to keep on file.
“I remember once working on a discovery project, and I had to gather records from corporate counsel and their company's manufacturing plants,” Den Ouden says. “When we requested the documents, they took us outside to these sheds where there were boxes–literally hundreds of square feet–of paper.”
Thanks to the advent of certain technologies, in-house counsel don't have to be paper packrats anymore. Document imaging, e-billing software and matter-management systems have become much more commonplace in the corporate environment, and all help lawyers reduce their carbon footprint. This helps save the environment and also save on costs.
“What I find most striking is that the most expensive course a law department can take is printing everything and being paper-centric,” says Ross Kodner, president of MicroLaw, a legal technology consultancy. “Focusing on building electronic case and matter files actually yields the least expensive operating approach, not to mention the inherent greenness. It just makes sense from all perspectives.”
Paper Packrats
What doesn't make sense is why in-house counsel are so reluctant to relinquish their grip on paper, especially because they're constantly told to reduce their spending.
“Law is about precedent–being able to come up with the correct documents and resources at will,” Den Ouden says.
With modern technology, however, lawyers can not only find that specific letter without having to waste paper, they also can find it much faster. By imaging documents and hosting them on a matter- or document-management system, in-house counsel can share an endless array of materials across the network without ever having to use additional paper.
“E-mail threads are notoriously some of the most wasteful documents,” says Mitch Taube, CEO of Digiscribe International, a document imaging provider. “Even if you only need one page, you often end up printing the whole thread. If you imaged that document and put it into a document-management system, not only would you save on printing, but it'd be full-text searchable, shareable and preserved.”
According to a study by Coopers & Lybrand [now PricewaterhouseCoopers], the average hardcopy document gets photocopied 19 times within its lifetime. If the average four-drawer file cabinet holds about 20,000 pages, that equates to 360,000 additional pieces of paper. By using document imaging and document- and matter-management systems, as well as some print-button self restraint, counsel can do their part to go green.
Digital Bills
It's not just internal documents that create paper waste. Outside counsel and vendor bills are a huge source of paper waste too.
According to Jeff Bolke, senior vice president of field operations for DataCert Inc., an e-billing software provider, his company's clientele average about 1,000 bills per month. However, this doesn't account for any discrepancies in the bill, which tacks on even more paper usage.
E-billing eliminates the need to use any paper. Law firms and vendors electronically send their invoices to the legal department, and the legal department then either electronically accepts the bill or makes adjustments using software. The software then transmits these revisions back to the initial source, which then can send a revised invoice electronically.
For a company that processes the average 12,000 invoices a year–an average of about 36,000 pieces of paper if printed–using e-billing would spare three-quarters of a ton of paper annually, according to the Department of Energy. This equates to about 17 trees. Further, because paper production uses energy and oil, this provides additional environmental savings of more than 333 gallons of oil and 2,880 energy kilowatts.
Fringe Benefits
But there are more benefits to going paperless than saving trees, oil and energy. For legal departments that need a business case to go green, there are plenty.
“For law departments that become centered around digital files, the biggest benefit is time conversion,” Kodner says, which refers to the significant amount of productive time wasted searching for paper files and information that can only be found in paper files.
Kodner, who developed and teaches CLE courses on “The Paper LESS Office,” a now 15-year-old approach to reducing paper in law firms and legal departments, says he sees lawyers and staff waste as much as 25 percent of their time looking for information that can only be found in paper form.
But to truly reduce paper output and become a paperless department, in-house and outside counsel will have to work together and share technologies. After all, if a legal department uses an e-billing system that one of its law firms doesn't use, the benefit of the system is lost. Currently legal departments tend to be ahead of the pack, and it may take some prodding to get outside counsel to follow suit.
“I see more effort made by my corporate clients regarding recycling than I see in private law firms,” Kodner says. “It's probably due to the trickle-down effect that comes from a companywide set of educational initiatives. But from the perspective of the environment, who cares where the push comes from as long as it exists.”
ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: To read more about how technology can reduce paper waste, click here.
Many lawyers believe the nature of their profession necessitates the hoarding of paper–a lot of paper–a misconception that through time has made them the enemy of tree
Matt Den Ouden used to belong to this school of thought. A national director of CT Tymetrix, a provider of matter management technologies, Den Ouden has worked side-by-side with legal departments and law firms for about 15 years and was shocked at the sheer volume of paper lawyers forced their companies to keep on file.
“I remember once working on a discovery project, and I had to gather records from corporate counsel and their company's manufacturing plants,” Den Ouden says. “When we requested the documents, they took us outside to these sheds where there were boxes–literally hundreds of square feet–of paper.”
Thanks to the advent of certain technologies, in-house counsel don't have to be paper packrats anymore. Document imaging, e-billing software and matter-management systems have become much more commonplace in the corporate environment, and all help lawyers reduce their carbon footprint. This helps save the environment and also save on costs.
“What I find most striking is that the most expensive course a law department can take is printing everything and being paper-centric,” says Ross Kodner, president of MicroLaw, a legal technology consultancy. “Focusing on building electronic case and matter files actually yields the least expensive operating approach, not to mention the inherent greenness. It just makes sense from all perspectives.”
Paper Packrats
What doesn't make sense is why in-house counsel are so reluctant to relinquish their grip on paper, especially because they're constantly told to reduce their spending.
“Law is about precedent–being able to come up with the correct documents and resources at will,” Den Ouden says.
With modern technology, however, lawyers can not only find that specific letter without having to waste paper, they also can find it much faster. By imaging documents and hosting them on a matter- or document-management system, in-house counsel can share an endless array of materials across the network without ever having to use additional paper.
“E-mail threads are notoriously some of the most wasteful documents,” says Mitch Taube, CEO of Digiscribe International, a document imaging provider. “Even if you only need one page, you often end up printing the whole thread. If you imaged that document and put it into a document-management system, not only would you save on printing, but it'd be full-text searchable, shareable and preserved.”
According to a study by Coopers & Lybrand [now PricewaterhouseCoopers], the average hardcopy document gets photocopied 19 times within its lifetime. If the average four-drawer file cabinet holds about 20,000 pages, that equates to 360,000 additional pieces of paper. By using document imaging and document- and matter-management systems, as well as some print-button self restraint, counsel can do their part to go green.
Digital Bills
It's not just internal documents that create paper waste. Outside counsel and vendor bills are a huge source of paper waste too.
According to Jeff Bolke, senior vice president of field operations for DataCert Inc., an e-billing software provider, his company's clientele average about 1,000 bills per month. However, this doesn't account for any discrepancies in the bill, which tacks on even more paper usage.
E-billing eliminates the need to use any paper. Law firms and vendors electronically send their invoices to the legal department, and the legal department then either electronically accepts the bill or makes adjustments using software. The software then transmits these revisions back to the initial source, which then can send a revised invoice electronically.
For a company that processes the average 12,000 invoices a year–an average of about 36,000 pieces of paper if printed–using e-billing would spare three-quarters of a ton of paper annually, according to the Department of Energy. This equates to about 17 trees. Further, because paper production uses energy and oil, this provides additional environmental savings of more than 333 gallons of oil and 2,880 energy kilowatts.
Fringe Benefits
But there are more benefits to going paperless than saving trees, oil and energy. For legal departments that need a business case to go green, there are plenty.
“For law departments that become centered around digital files, the biggest benefit is time conversion,” Kodner says, which refers to the significant amount of productive time wasted searching for paper files and information that can only be found in paper files.
Kodner, who developed and teaches CLE courses on “The Paper LESS Office,” a now 15-year-old approach to reducing paper in law firms and legal departments, says he sees lawyers and staff waste as much as 25 percent of their time looking for information that can only be found in paper form.
But to truly reduce paper output and become a paperless department, in-house and outside counsel will have to work together and share technologies. After all, if a legal department uses an e-billing system that one of its law firms doesn't use, the benefit of the system is lost. Currently legal departments tend to be ahead of the pack, and it may take some prodding to get outside counsel to follow suit.
“I see more effort made by my corporate clients regarding recycling than I see in private law firms,” Kodner says. “It's probably due to the trickle-down effect that comes from a companywide set of educational initiatives. But from the perspective of the environment, who cares where the push comes from as long as it exists.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
King Kullen—the Nation's First Supermarket—Hires Outside Counsel as GC
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 2Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 3Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
- 4Against the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
- 5US Supreme Court Justices Pass on Landlord Challenge to NY Rent Stabilization
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250