Rules of Responsibility
60 Minute Rule gives critical matters immediate attention.
July 31, 2008 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
It's Sunday afternoon. Your phone rings. A significant threat has been called into one of your facilities. How will your organization respond?
In today's world, this scenario is an all too real potential challenge for a company and its inside counsel. How do you protect your company from liability and safeguard its reputation? More importantly, how do you make certain your facility takes proper action to ensure the safety of employees, customers and the community?
As a company with facilities across the country, Kaplan Higher Education (KHE) uses what we call the “60 Minute Rule.”
This rule ensures that our senior management team receives timely notification of critical matters affecting our business, no matter when or where they occur, so that the proper people and resources can be involved from the start.
Of course, no “rule” or policy is effective without proper implementation. The roles and responsibilities of all involved in a critical matter–from detection and reporting to triage and response–must be clearly communicated and regularly reinforced.
To achieve this at KHE, we distribute copies of the 60 Minute Rule annually to the senior officials at all of our facilities as well as during our onboarding process. We ask them and their designees to acknowledge in writing that they understand the rule. Then we task these leaders with the responsibility of informing their staffs about the rule, and we widely distribute wallet cards with contact information for reporting incidents. Any individual can properly report a critical matter any time and anywhere it happens.
Our 60 Minute Rule is broken down into two main categories: Red Alerts and Yellow Alerts.
Red Alerts have the potential to significantly risk or interrupt business operations and require immediate support. Red Alert items must be reported to a live person by telephone within 60 minutes of their occurrence. This contact person is a member of the legal and compliance department, ensuring that matters are addressed systematically and that any related legal issues are taken into consideration.
Red Alerts include events that may involve significant injury or harm to any person, such as a facility fire, medical emergency or accident. They also include legal matters requiring prompt attention, such as service of process or nonroutine visits by law enforcement or regulators.
Our Yellow Alerts also are matters of high importance, but not emergencies. We require our employees to report Yellow Alert matters within 24 hours to the appropriate person at our home office by e-mail (and follow-up communication is required to ensure receipt of the e-mail). The appropriate contact person varies by type of matter. For example, the contact people for our Yellow Alerts may be from legal, regulatory affairs, human resources, information technology or real estate.
Yellow Alerts include the service of routine legal papers (such as garnishments and record subpoenas) and correspondence or calls from attorneys. Other examples include employment matters and routine inquiries from local regulatory or government agencies.
Of course, no policy can contemplate or effectively communicate every possible scenario, so we continually remind everyone, “When in doubt, report it!”
Having geographically dispersed facilities does not mean that any location should be forced to act alone. A wide network of resources is in place to properly support each of our matters. Our 60 Minute Rule allows us to be responsive to important business matters no matter where they are and ensures that the right resources are available to protect our students, employees, communities and organization.
It's Sunday afternoon. Your phone rings. A significant threat has been called into one of your facilities. How will your organization respond?
In today's world, this scenario is an all too real potential challenge for a company and its inside counsel. How do you protect your company from liability and safeguard its reputation? More importantly, how do you make certain your facility takes proper action to ensure the safety of employees, customers and the community?
As a company with facilities across the country, Kaplan Higher Education (KHE) uses what we call the “60 Minute Rule.”
This rule ensures that our senior management team receives timely notification of critical matters affecting our business, no matter when or where they occur, so that the proper people and resources can be involved from the start.
Of course, no “rule” or policy is effective without proper implementation. The roles and responsibilities of all involved in a critical matter–from detection and reporting to triage and response–must be clearly communicated and regularly reinforced.
To achieve this at KHE, we distribute copies of the 60 Minute Rule annually to the senior officials at all of our facilities as well as during our onboarding process. We ask them and their designees to acknowledge in writing that they understand the rule. Then we task these leaders with the responsibility of informing their staffs about the rule, and we widely distribute wallet cards with contact information for reporting incidents. Any individual can properly report a critical matter any time and anywhere it happens.
Our 60 Minute Rule is broken down into two main categories: Red Alerts and Yellow Alerts.
Red Alerts have the potential to significantly risk or interrupt business operations and require immediate support. Red Alert items must be reported to a live person by telephone within 60 minutes of their occurrence. This contact person is a member of the legal and compliance department, ensuring that matters are addressed systematically and that any related legal issues are taken into consideration.
Red Alerts include events that may involve significant injury or harm to any person, such as a facility fire, medical emergency or accident. They also include legal matters requiring prompt attention, such as service of process or nonroutine visits by law enforcement or regulators.
Our Yellow Alerts also are matters of high importance, but not emergencies. We require our employees to report Yellow Alert matters within 24 hours to the appropriate person at our home office by e-mail (and follow-up communication is required to ensure receipt of the e-mail). The appropriate contact person varies by type of matter. For example, the contact people for our Yellow Alerts may be from legal, regulatory affairs, human resources, information technology or real estate.
Yellow Alerts include the service of routine legal papers (such as garnishments and record subpoenas) and correspondence or calls from attorneys. Other examples include employment matters and routine inquiries from local regulatory or government agencies.
Of course, no policy can contemplate or effectively communicate every possible scenario, so we continually remind everyone, “When in doubt, report it!”
Having geographically dispersed facilities does not mean that any location should be forced to act alone. A wide network of resources is in place to properly support each of our matters. Our 60 Minute Rule allows us to be responsive to important business matters no matter where they are and ensures that the right resources are available to protect our students, employees, communities and organization.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250