Data Disasters
In-house counsel rely on technology to maintain business continuity during catastrophes.
August 31, 2008 at 08:00 PM
11 minute read
On the Friday before Hurricane Katrina made landfall three years ago, David Erwin, chief information officer at the law firm of Adams and Reese, left his downtown New Orleans office, expecting to ride out the storm. By Sunday morning, the hurricane had developed into a Category 5. Fortunately, he and his team had already taken precautions.
“After 9/11 we recognized the need to invest in disaster recovery,” Erwin says.
Thanks to this planning, Erwin was able to switch the systems over to a third-party backup system once the building lost power. When the levies broke and the city experienced massive flooding, Erwin's team acted fast, acquiring real estate in Baton Rouge for a new office. All this was done without the aid of cell phones, which had been rendered useless by the storm. Instead, e-mail was available, thanks to Erwin's disaster recovery planning.
“We had Blackberry continuity because a third-party vendor set up our systems so in the event of a disaster all messages would be forwarded to and accessible on its systems,” Erwin says.
Although the disaster Erwin faced is rare, unexpected interruptions to business are not. In-house counsel, along with a team of other department representatives, need to equip their companies with the technology to ensure business continuity and compliance in the face of disaster.
“When the doors are closed, your business is closed,” says Todd Hauschildt, vice president of managed technology services at West, a unit of Thomson Reuters that hosts technology systems for its clients. “When a court date is set, it isn't always an automatic reschedule just because of hardship. Companies need to be ready to continue business no matter what.”
Team Effort
According to Hauschildt, natural disasters cause only 8 percent of unplanned business interruptions. The more likely culprits are smaller in scale, such as power outages and loss of Internet connectivity. In the past, such incidents, which often result in outages of no more than a day or two, weren't very serious. But with the reliance on e-mail to conduct business, the pressure to maintain business continuity has increased.
This is why preparation is crucial, and it starts with the development of a disaster recovery team. This team needs to include representatives from all areas of the company, including IT, records management, compliance, security, business personnel and legal.
Legal's role is especially important. If a facility is destroyed, as in Erwin's case, in-house counsel need to quickly negotiate contracts to acquire temporary or permanent real estate. Legal must also ensure that all documents subject to retention, whether for regulatory or litigation purposes, are securely stored and accessible.
“If you have litigation, materials collected for e-discovery need to be protected,” says Paul D'Arcy, vice president of marketing at Dell MessageOne, a provider of disaster recovery solutions. “There's no get-out-of-jail-free card because a disaster destroyed the data.”
Save the Systems
One of the first things a disaster can affect is communications. Something as cataclysmic as Hurricane Katrina or Sept. 11 can effectively shut down all telephonic communications, including cell phones. In those situations, e-mail communications become crucial, both for ensuring that employees are safe and communicating with customers and solidifying offsite work facilities to ensure business continuity. “We have a service where, in a matter of minutes, you can put e-mail users in a backup system that is remotely hosted,” D'Arcy says.
Besides ensuring the stability of communications, it is important to back up and secure the organization's existing information, from e-mails to databases. This is especially true for companies with specific regulatory requirements, such as those in the financial sector, as well as companies currently engaged in litigation and subject to litigation holds.
There are a variety of technological offerings to help companies do this. These solutions transmit company data to an offsite, secure location for storage. When a disaster strikes, the company can immediately switch over to the offsite backup and access crucial documents.
“Customers set specific requirements for the frequency of data backup,” says Richard Heitman, vice president of product management for EVault, a provider of data backup solutions. “They can have it set at once a week, once a day or even once every 15 minutes.”
Keeping Current
It is important to understand how that data backup system works. Erwin found out the hard way that his backup systems were not as easy to recover information from as he had hoped.
“At the time we were backing up data onto tapes, which are no longer an effective tool for preparing for a disaster simply because of the time it takes to restore the tapes,” he says.
Since Katrina, Erwin's firm captures an image of the data contained on its servers every hour and mirrors that over to an offsite, secondary data center. By doing this, he reduced recovery time from 24 hours to about four. As Erwin's post-Katrina assessment shows, companies should continually revisit their disaster recovery policies.
“It's easy to put together a disaster recovery plan that covers the major areas of a company,” Hauschildt says. “What is much harder is the discipline to continually keep the plan updated.”
On the Friday before Hurricane Katrina made landfall three years ago, David Erwin, chief information officer at the law firm of
“After 9/11 we recognized the need to invest in disaster recovery,” Erwin says.
Thanks to this planning, Erwin was able to switch the systems over to a third-party backup system once the building lost power. When the levies broke and the city experienced massive flooding, Erwin's team acted fast, acquiring real estate in Baton Rouge for a new office. All this was done without the aid of cell phones, which had been rendered useless by the storm. Instead, e-mail was available, thanks to Erwin's disaster recovery planning.
“We had Blackberry continuity because a third-party vendor set up our systems so in the event of a disaster all messages would be forwarded to and accessible on its systems,” Erwin says.
Although the disaster Erwin faced is rare, unexpected interruptions to business are not. In-house counsel, along with a team of other department representatives, need to equip their companies with the technology to ensure business continuity and compliance in the face of disaster.
“When the doors are closed, your business is closed,” says Todd Hauschildt, vice president of managed technology services at West, a unit of Thomson Reuters that hosts technology systems for its clients. “When a court date is set, it isn't always an automatic reschedule just because of hardship. Companies need to be ready to continue business no matter what.”
Team Effort
According to Hauschildt, natural disasters cause only 8 percent of unplanned business interruptions. The more likely culprits are smaller in scale, such as power outages and loss of Internet connectivity. In the past, such incidents, which often result in outages of no more than a day or two, weren't very serious. But with the reliance on e-mail to conduct business, the pressure to maintain business continuity has increased.
This is why preparation is crucial, and it starts with the development of a disaster recovery team. This team needs to include representatives from all areas of the company, including IT, records management, compliance, security, business personnel and legal.
Legal's role is especially important. If a facility is destroyed, as in Erwin's case, in-house counsel need to quickly negotiate contracts to acquire temporary or permanent real estate. Legal must also ensure that all documents subject to retention, whether for regulatory or litigation purposes, are securely stored and accessible.
“If you have litigation, materials collected for e-discovery need to be protected,” says Paul D'Arcy, vice president of marketing at Dell MessageOne, a provider of disaster recovery solutions. “There's no get-out-of-jail-free card because a disaster destroyed the data.”
Save the Systems
One of the first things a disaster can affect is communications. Something as cataclysmic as Hurricane Katrina or Sept. 11 can effectively shut down all telephonic communications, including cell phones. In those situations, e-mail communications become crucial, both for ensuring that employees are safe and communicating with customers and solidifying offsite work facilities to ensure business continuity. “We have a service where, in a matter of minutes, you can put e-mail users in a backup system that is remotely hosted,” D'Arcy says.
Besides ensuring the stability of communications, it is important to back up and secure the organization's existing information, from e-mails to databases. This is especially true for companies with specific regulatory requirements, such as those in the financial sector, as well as companies currently engaged in litigation and subject to litigation holds.
There are a variety of technological offerings to help companies do this. These solutions transmit company data to an offsite, secure location for storage. When a disaster strikes, the company can immediately switch over to the offsite backup and access crucial documents.
“Customers set specific requirements for the frequency of data backup,” says Richard Heitman, vice president of product management for EVault, a provider of data backup solutions. “They can have it set at once a week, once a day or even once every 15 minutes.”
Keeping Current
It is important to understand how that data backup system works. Erwin found out the hard way that his backup systems were not as easy to recover information from as he had hoped.
“At the time we were backing up data onto tapes, which are no longer an effective tool for preparing for a disaster simply because of the time it takes to restore the tapes,” he says.
Since Katrina, Erwin's firm captures an image of the data contained on its servers every hour and mirrors that over to an offsite, secondary data center. By doing this, he reduced recovery time from 24 hours to about four. As Erwin's post-Katrina assessment shows, companies should continually revisit their disaster recovery policies.
“It's easy to put together a disaster recovery plan that covers the major areas of a company,” Hauschildt says. “What is much harder is the discipline to continually keep the plan updated.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readFTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250