Taking New Steps
Microsoft's legal department launches new diversity initiative.
August 31, 2008 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Enhancing diversity in the legal profession is a longstanding and important priority. Yet looking at the numbers, it's clear we still have a long way to go.
Last year the National Association for Law Placement estimated that only 18 percent of partners at the nation's large law firms are women and only 5.4 percent are minorities. Despite plenty of good intentions and broad activities, there's still a lot of room for progress.
In July, Microsoft's legal department decided to take some new steps. We announced changes to our payment terms for 17 leading law firms that handle $150 million of our work annually. We're making the final 2 percent of each firm's legal fees payable as a bonus, contingent on whether they make defined, quantitative progress in diversity results. This can involve either an increase in diverse attorney representation on our matters or an increase in diversity among the firm's U.S. attorneys as a whole.
We launched this program after a lot of thought and discussion both with these firms and within our department. We were inspired by many other individuals and groups who are taking important strides to advance diversity. We concluded that it was important for us to add to their initiatives by becoming more proactive ourselves.
We acted from the conviction that diversity in our legal teams is a business necessity. We cannot be effective if we cannot understand and appreciate the interests of the incredibly diverse individuals who make up our stakeholder groups. This is important both for our own department and for the law firms on which we rely.
We also acted with the hope that new steps might accelerate progress.
We believe in applying valuable lessons from the world of business. For one thing, economics really does matter. When it comes to advancing diversity, our profession is not yet embracing the “pay for performance” approach that successfully guides most activity in our economy.
It makes sense to try.
We need accountability that works. The ultimate form of accountability in business is the risk that one will lose his or her job or client. But there's also the opportunity to couple this prospect with a more granular approach that includes important but incremental risks and rewards.
We concluded that if we were going to ask those who work for us to commit to something new, we needed to make a similar commitment ourselves. We therefore decided that 5 percent of the annual bonus of our most senior inside attorneys–including me–would depend on the level of success by our law firms in improving diversity and earning their bonus from us. If they succeed, so will we. If they fail, we fail.
We've also launched new activities to work in closer partnerships with our leading law firms. These range from joint diversity pipeline development and recruiting initiatives to an advocacy academy to introduce diverse litigators at these firms to our litigation group. We're backing this up with a three-fold increase in our budget for diversity projects, now totaling $750,000 per year.
Finally, we believe that in business the best form of learning often comes from doing. This is not to underestimate the importance of being thoughtful in advance. But in most circumstances one can learn more quickly by experimenting with new initiatives than by debating their merits.
As those who sponsored the Call to Action and many others have demonstrated, this is an important time for all of us to try new ideas and take new steps. At Microsoft we know that we don't have all the answers. But if across corporate America all of us become more proactive and work in closer partnerships with law firms and each other, we'll all become faster learners.
And from that, more impressive results will follow.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
6 minute readPeople and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
7 minute readDigging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 2A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 3Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 4State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 5Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250