Deploying Diversity
The in-house bar should step up and make diversity a legal department priority.
September 30, 2008 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Nowhere has diversity been more prominent than in this year's presidential election process thanks to the candidates: a septuagenarian (Sen. John McCain), an African-American (Sen. Barack Obama), a Hispanic (Governor Bill Richardson), a female (Sen. Hillary Clinton) and a Mormon (Gov. Mitt Romney). All of these individuals were qualified and brought a rich and innovative thought process to how to make this country and world better. Notably, the two leading Democratic candidates during the primary both were lawyers.
Diversity–a voluntary measure put into effect in workplaces, educational institutions, major corporations and businesses–is as needed today as it was 20 years ago. When it comes to diversity, the 2000 U.S. Census reveals that the legal profession lags behind all other professions. There are more minority doctors, engineers and civil service workers in the U.S. than there are minority lawyers. It is time for the legal profession to stop plodding around and pick up the pace.
Today, profitable companies understand the importance of selling their goods and services to diverse consumers across multiple platforms. For instance, cosmetic companies historically sold products targeting only Caucasian women. Once they realized that women of color also wear makeup, they started developing makeup to meet the needs of the untapped market. Thereby, they were able to increase their profits.
The evolution of the American grocery store is another great example of the impact of diversification. As a child growing up in the early 1980s, I remember being limited to a small selection of frozen food items such as Swanson TV dinners. Today, offerings are available from around the globe including Asian, Indian and Thai frozen food. Even the tastes of born-and-bred Americans reflect cultural differences such as Southern or Western cuisine.
By meeting the needs of its consumers, stores have been able to improve margins and satisfy the needs of its base.
The legal profession should be no different. A diverse profession at the highest levels of decision making can create a business that is more relevant, competitive and satisfying to the customers. The bottom line is that law firms, major corporations and educational institutions must reflect the market at large, their clients and their clients' customers. Everyone in the legal field must work together to bring more diversity to the profession and stop the bleeding of the high attrition rates.
In a law firm or legal department, a lawyer can get the feel of the culture through observation alone. When the workplace is rich in diversity, the overpowering message is that all employees are valued and have a chance to go as far as their drive, initiative, creativity and aspirations will carry them. They can grow through mentorship from workers who can pull their coattails when they are erring or give them encouragement when they are excelling. A diverse workplace brings out the very best in everyone. It also inspires, energizes and motivates.
The bottom line is still money. When the legal department becomes a revolving door, money and time are lost by having to constantly train new workers. This results in a loss of work consistency and does not give employees enough time to buy into the company's goals and mission.
As the nation continues to become more diverse, companies interested in maximizing profits will need to step up to the plate, be counted and require accountability. It is mandatory that lawyers step up to the bar as leaders in augmenting the necessary changes to make diversity a reality. As the profession mandated with upholding the laws and assuring rights of constituents, the legal profession should be in the forefront for diversity implementation and serve as a model for the rest of the nation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readGC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
2 minute readPreparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250