LIP Service
In-house legal internship programs are a win-win for legal departments and law school students.
November 30, 2008 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
While summer internship programs are common at many law firms, corporate legal departments rarely take advantage of this cost-effective source of energetic and smart labor.
There are many advantages to starting a legal internship program (LIP)–and I don't mean sending out bright-eyed students to pick up your dry cleaning or your latte at Starbucks. When given challenging assignments, a small team of intelligent law school students can dramatically boost your department's productivity by reviewing documents, analyzing data and conducting research–gathering state data, for example, is an excellent summer intern project. While you benefit from the economical work that is accomplished, your interns gain a unique opportunity to experience day-to-day legal life in a corporate environment.
Properly managed interns should have the chance to immerse themselves in your industry, acquiring hands-on experience that goes beyond the mundane tasks generally assigned to clerks who work at mid- and large-sized law firms.
Additionally, legal interns can gain exposure to other areas within your organization. Such exposure may help them realize a new career path if they find their talents better suited to another department or business unit. Departments such as regulatory affairs, compliance or even human resources may appreciate the assistance of an intern team member who has a legal education and background.
In addition to building a future pipeline of talent for your legal department, your interns may continue to be resources for you when they return to school. Students are always short on cash and long on time; if you need ongoing assistance in research, for example, your intern alumni may be willing to work remotely conducting research while juggling their studies. This is an excellent way to ensure your department's research objectives are met while offsetting some of your outside legal spending.
Setting up a LIP is simple, but timing is important. To gain the most from the program, you should begin preparing now. Here's a quick five-step checklist to get you started:
- 1. Decide how many interns your business can support and the types of projects to which they should be assigned.
- 2. Develop a reporting structure for your program, such as identifying mentors for your interns.
- 3. Decide who will manage your interns and their workflow.
- 4. Determine the compensation that is in line with the projects your interns will take on and their skill sets.
- 5. Seek candidates with the skill sets that match your projects. Though many companies and law firms look for second-year law students, at Kaplan Higher Education we have found that first-year students also deliver an exceptionally high value.
Taking the above steps will lead to a successful experience for you and
your interns.
Kaplan Higher Education launched an LIP in 2007. The program flourished and continued this past summer, and we look forward to building upon its success in years to come. We have been able to realize some tremendous work product in terms of research and analytical memos from our talented team of legal interns. Moreover, we have been able to cultivate an exceptional talent pool.
Internships at your organization are a win-win–for you and the law school students you retain for your program. As the legal field grows more complex and extends more into other corporate functions, our future colleagues need the type of experiences we can offer to help them be better prepared for their careers.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readHow Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
5 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250