Sweet Success
Vivian Tseng, GC of Welch's and CLO of the National Grape Cooperative Inc., talks more about paving her path as a successful in-house lawyer while maintaining a work-life balance.
December 31, 2008 at 07:00 PM
4 minute read
To read the full interview with Welch's GC Vivian Tseng, click here.
—
Q: Tell me a little about your background. What was your undergrad major and why did you decide to go into law?
A: I was able to devise my own major, Political Theory, a sort of compromise between political science (which can lack sufficient conceptual content) and political philosophy (which can get overly esoteric). I wasn't sure I wanted to go to law school until I had a taste of graduate school and realized that I did not want a career in academia. Law school allowed me a path to connect with the “real world.”
Q: What was your first job out of law school (until you went in-house)?
A: I joined the general practice law firm of Tillinghast Collins & Gram in Providence, R. I. It was a wonderful experience because they had an official rotation program for new associates and I was able to spend meaningful time in each major area of practice: litigation, corporate, tax, commercial and trust & estates. That broad exposure was really invaluable, and I think that it stood me in very good stead when I later went in-house. After a few years, I left to join Foley Hoag & Eliot in Boston, specializing in tax. From there, I left for Welch's.
Q: What do you like most about your job at Welch's?
A: Well, quite frankly, I like being in charge. But there are days when I would envy one of my direct reports and think, oh if I only had his job things would be easier. But I enjoy being the adviser that I am to the two Boards and to the management and to the CEO. I mire that counseling with a small “c” more then anything else. It's that one-on-one counseling that's very fulfilling.
I'm enjoying the fruits of my years. I'm a very senior person in this organization and I think, knock on wood or at the risk of sounding a little overly self-satisfied, I really feel that I have the respect and the well-regard of the entire organization just because I've been around for so long as well as up and down through the ranks. We have a fairly stable employee population so over time you get to know a lot of people in all the nooks and crannies of the organization. It's very fulfilling.
Q: How did you manage being an active career woman and a mother?
A: I have two children. My daughter is in her first year of college and my younger child is a junior in high school. My life over time has become balanced. Again you do these things sequentially.
I was very active before I had children and then I stopped because when your kids are young, there's plenty else to do. And I started re-entering the bar association voluntary world when my daughter started high school. I was out for a good period of time. And more recently I've been able to come back.
There are no magic answers to the work-life balance, and I don't know that there's any solution to that time period of every mother's life when your kids are young. I mean I've always worked full time. I've only taken the three-month maternity leave, and I remember so vividly to this day what it was like when my kids were young. And when you're that busy for a period of years, what happens is you don't remember because the pace is such that something doesn't sink in. And one doesn't remember. So I tell younger women that you can't have it all. There are sacrifices and one should be realistic about that.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Productivity Suite Startup Macro Announces $12 Million Funding Round
- 2Rudy Giuliani Loses Bid to Dismiss $1.3 Million Davidoff Hutcher & Citron Suit Over Unpaid Legal Fees
- 3Discovery Dispute: Investigated Judge Boxed Out by Work Product Doctrine
- 4Florida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
- 5How My Postpartum Depression Led to Launching My Firm’s Parental Leave Coaching Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250