Sweet Success
Vivian Tseng finds a juicy career, as well as work-life balance, as the top legal executive of Welch's.
December 31, 2008 at 07:00 PM
6 minute read
To hear more from Welch's GC Vivian Tseng, click here.
Vivian Tseng |
Vivian Tseng may not have had her sights set on law school when she took her first classes at New College, but she was determined to make the most of her undergraduate education. Tseng's Virginia-based college didn't offer the major she wanted–a combination of political science and political philosophy. So she devised her own–political theory–which offered her the benefits she wanted out of both areas of study.
Her drive and creativity didn't stop there.
Tseng ultimately decided on law school because she believed it would connect her to the “real world.” After graduating from Georgetown, she immediately landed a law firm gig that allowed her to try her hand at practice areas including litigation, corporate, tax, commercial, and trust and estates.
With determination and well-rounded legal experience backing her talent, nothing stood in the way of Tseng's next goal–achieving work-life balance while maintaining her place as a successful lawyer. “The only way I could have a career as well as time for my family was to look for an in-house position,” she explains.
And it didn't take long. In 1986, Tseng left the law firm world for an in-house position at Welch's, where she has climbed the ranks. She now serves as vice president, general counsel and secretary in the company's three-lawyer legal department, as well as the chief legal officer of the National Grape Cooperative Association Inc. (NGCA)–Welch's parent organization.
Q: How did you end up at Welch's?
A: I had an informational interview with a head hunter. He had just come from talking with the then-general counsel of Welch's, who at the time was undergoing a very threatening tax audit. I had begun to focus on tax at the law firm, so the head hunter thought it was serendipitous. I talked with the Welch's GC, and I believe his interest in adding staff was fueled by his interview with me. He had a very positive reaction to what I had to offer.
Q: Outside of work-life balance, what attracted you to an in-house position?
A: Specializing at a law firm wasn't very fulfilling. It wasn't intellectually interesting. I was also looking for an opportunity to be something more than a tax specialist, which was very difficult to find in private practice. That's what attracted me to in-house practice. And I've always been really interested in business. So looking for a broader legal practice area and being closer to a business enterprise made in-house work very attractive.
Q: The NGCA owns Welch's. How does this affect your job?
A:It means I have three very distinct constituencies, the growers and our two boards. And the two boards are separate bodies: a board and a corporation. They develop personalities and quirks and different perspectives. In addition to the two boards and the ownership base, there is also management and its perspectives. It makes for an interesting set of perspectives to balance and to accommodate.
Q: How has the legal department changed since you took over as GC?
A:We have changed in two respects. We have brought substantive expertise in-house. We continue to be generalists, but I intentionally started to build substantive in-house expertise quite a while back because that makes for the most cost-effective and efficient kind of operation. Before, we were a conduit between our in-house clients and outside counsel. And at this point, even though my department is very small, our reliance on outside counsel is at a historic low. It's because of that substantive expertise we have built over time.
We also have gone from a no-assumption-of-risk to a knowing acceptance of risk. We're much less risk adverse than we were 20 years ago. We understand that it's riskier not to assume risk.
Q: What does the legal department handle on a regular basis?
A:We handle benefits, ERISA work and employment law mostly in-house. We do regulatory compliance and all manners of contracts. Any purchasing a business corporation needs, we handle in-house about 100 percent. Trademark maintenance is one area where we have an outside law firm help us. We're not a publicly held company so we don't have the SEC regulations to deal with.
Q: Have you suffered through any major litigation?
A:We're a food company. We don't have product liability problems because we can't afford to. We're very careful about that, and as a result, litigation is infrequent.
Q: Does your legal department have a formal diversity initiative in place?
A:We're small enough that we don't need formal programs. When I have an opening, I send out the information to the ethnic bar associations in town.
In terms of outside counsel, I do reach out to my colleagues at the ethnic bar associations nationally to identify minority lawyers.
Q: Why is involvement in outside organizations important to you?
A: It comes very naturally to me. It's just a matter of my personality and my values. The best way I can contribute is through my profession.
Q: What do you like most about your job at Welch's?
A:I like being in charge. I also enjoy being the adviser to the boards and to management. I'm enjoying the fruits of my years. I'm a very senior person in this organization, and I really feel that I have the respect of the entire organization.
Q: What are the more challenging aspects of your job?
A:I will never enjoy doing performance evaluations.
Q: What advice would you give to an up-and-coming lawyer with the goal to someday be GC of a large company?
A:Recognize early that there is no one path, but a lot of different paths, to the top. Relax, polish up your people skills, find ways to meet your clients in their comfort zones and develop good business skills. And once you've joined a company, understand the industry within which your company competes and get to know the levers of revenue generation for your company.
Q: What is your favorite Welch's product?
A:The crown jewel–Concord grape juice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250