Digital Depiction
The Sony HDR-SR12 high-def Handycam gives recording home video a whole new meaning.
January 31, 2009 at 07:00 PM
5 minute read
Making home movies is a whole different game than it was 25 years ago. Back then, you flipped on your camcorder, recorded your kids for a little while, then turned it off. Poof–you had a home movie with which to bore your friends at your next gathering. But today, easy-to-use editing software means just about anyone can try his hand at becoming the next Ken Burns. All you need is good talent, a well-developed plotline and of course a great camera.
Enter the Sony HDR-SR12 Handycam. Introduced in 2008, the camera is the highest-end of Sony's high definition hard drive camcorders.
The camera basics are solid. It boasts a good weight–if it were any lighter, it would be difficult to get a steady shot; any heavier it would become cumbersome over time. The camera's controls are appropriately positioned, making it easy to zoom with your index finger and start and stop with your thumb. The handy touchscreen allows users to go directly to a menu option without having to cycle through a lot of other features.
The camera also provides face detection–a feature rival cameras have offered for some time. It allows you to track up to eight faces at once, then sort your clips by face, making it easy the find an exact spot you were recording.
The picture quality is superior, and the HDR-SR12 is capable of recording in either high def or standard def. This means if you don't already own an HD TV, you'll have all the high-def video stored in HD when you bite the bullet and buy that high-def set.
Finally–and a big selling point for my husband and me–the camera can record up to 14 hours of high-resolution video on its hard drive. So if you're on a family vacation, you won't have to go back to your hotel room to dump footage onto your computer. While the battery life on the camera is only about 90 minutes, longer lasting batteries are sold separately.
The HDR-SR12 does indeed have its drawbacks. First, video files become huge when they transfer to iMovie–not good news for Mac users. Our solution to this problem: We bought a $200 one-terabyte drive to store all our video. No FireWire connection also creates an additional challenge for Mac users–loading the footage onto the computer is surprisingly slower than real time. (The camera only takes a USB connection.) Although I don't know from experience, based on reviews, PC users seem to have fewer problems.
The Sony HDR-SR12 doesn't come cheap–retailing for $1,299. But overall, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages, and for high-quality video and convenience, it's time and money well spent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250