Walking the Line
As in-house counsel, you're no stranger to putting forth an effort to maintain a strong ethical backbone for your legal department and your company.
April 30, 2009 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
After the birth of my son, a local photographer offered my new family a free sitting at his studio. He said the package he offered, which also included several prints, was valued at around $850. Although the photographer presented the offer outside of my work setting, he knew I was the editor of a magazine and could potentially offer him photography gigs in the future. He didn't say this was his intention–and it may not have been. But I didn't know. And as tempting as the offer was, I had to decline.
As a magazine editor, I sometimes face these types of ethical dilemmas. And it's my job to know the difference between someone offering a free product or service for legitimate editorial purposes and someone expecting something in return. Professionals in key decision-making positions will often find themselves confronted with ethical dilemmas.
As in-house counsel, you're no stranger to putting forth an effort to maintain a strong ethical backbone for your legal department and your company. Following the corporate corruption that emerged earlier in this decade, ethics took center stage for the corporate legal community, and the economic downturn has ensured an encore.
InsideCounsel has taken several steps in response to the increasing interest in corporate legal ethics. Earlier this year, we launched Ethical Insights, a new column–currently written by Brian Martin, general counsel of KLA-Tencor–that focuses on how GCs can build and maintain high ethical standards for their legal departments.
We also have dedicated this issue's cover story to the topic. In “Tough Calls,” we asked ethics experts and in-house counsel to take us through several scenarios in which in-house counsel face difficult ethical decisions. We cover four scenarios: disclosure, financial reporting, internal investigations and withdrawal (leaving your job when you believe your company has conducted itself unethically). In each situation, the general counsel must make a subjective, often difficult, decision.
As the economy continues to struggle and corporate corruption remains a reality, maintaining strong ethics will be a priority for in-house counsel. And regardless of economic or corporate trends, ethics will always be the hallmark of an upstanding legal department.
After the birth of my son, a local photographer offered my new family a free sitting at his studio. He said the package he offered, which also included several prints, was valued at around $850. Although the photographer presented the offer outside of my work setting, he knew I was the editor of a magazine and could potentially offer him photography gigs in the future. He didn't say this was his intention–and it may not have been. But I didn't know. And as tempting as the offer was, I had to decline.
As a magazine editor, I sometimes face these types of ethical dilemmas. And it's my job to know the difference between someone offering a free product or service for legitimate editorial purposes and someone expecting something in return. Professionals in key decision-making positions will often find themselves confronted with ethical dilemmas.
As in-house counsel, you're no stranger to putting forth an effort to maintain a strong ethical backbone for your legal department and your company. Following the corporate corruption that emerged earlier in this decade, ethics took center stage for the corporate legal community, and the economic downturn has ensured an encore.
InsideCounsel has taken several steps in response to the increasing interest in corporate legal ethics. Earlier this year, we launched Ethical Insights, a new column–currently written by Brian Martin, general counsel of KLA-Tencor–that focuses on how GCs can build and maintain high ethical standards for their legal departments.
We also have dedicated this issue's cover story to the topic. In “Tough Calls,” we asked ethics experts and in-house counsel to take us through several scenarios in which in-house counsel face difficult ethical decisions. We cover four scenarios: disclosure, financial reporting, internal investigations and withdrawal (leaving your job when you believe your company has conducted itself unethically). In each situation, the general counsel must make a subjective, often difficult, decision.
As the economy continues to struggle and corporate corruption remains a reality, maintaining strong ethics will be a priority for in-house counsel. And regardless of economic or corporate trends, ethics will always be the hallmark of an upstanding legal department.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250