Reviews and Rulings
Before China blocked Coke's acquisition, it had already reviewed other applications under the Anti-Monopoly Law.
May 31, 2009 at 08:00 PM
2 minute read
China blocks Coke's acquistion of a chinese juice company.
—
Between Aug. 1, 2008, when China's Anti-Monopoly Law (ALM) came into force, and mid-March, when the Chinese rejected the Coke-Huiyan merger, the Ministry of Commerce received 40 notifications under the legislation and reviewed 29 of them.
Before the Coke decision, rulings had been made in 24 cases. Twenty-three transactions were approved unconditionally. But the other case, which involved the worldwide merger of brewers U.S.-based Anheuser-Busch and Belgian-based InBev, received approval from Chinese regulators in November 2008, only after the breweries agreed not to increase their existing stakes in Chinese companies. The restrictions fueled speculation that the ALM was aimed at foreign companies.
China blocks Coke's acquistion of a chinese juice company.
—
Between Aug. 1, 2008, when China's Anti-Monopoly Law (ALM) came into force, and mid-March, when the Chinese rejected the Coke-Huiyan merger, the Ministry of Commerce received 40 notifications under the legislation and reviewed 29 of them.
Before the Coke decision, rulings had been made in 24 cases. Twenty-three transactions were approved unconditionally. But the other case, which involved the worldwide merger of brewers U.S.-based Anheuser-Busch and Belgian-based InBev, received approval from Chinese regulators in November 2008, only after the breweries agreed not to increase their existing stakes in Chinese companies. The restrictions fueled speculation that the ALM was aimed at foreign companies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
- 1Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
- 2Choice-of-Law Issues as the UCC 2022 Amendments Come into Effect
- 3Six Benefits of Taking an Opposing Medical Expert’s Deposition
- 4Ex-Prosecutor’s Trial Ends as Judge Throws Out Her Felony Indictment in Ahmaud Arbery Death Case
- 5Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
