Maximizing Conference Experience: You Got the Interview! Now What?
Your follow-up to an introduction worked. Now, Mike helps you succeed at the sit-down.
June 08, 2009 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
Attorneys are self-confident individuals. If only I had a dime for every time I heard… “If I can just get in the door, I'll blow their socks off.”
In the last two columns, I covered how to make a conference-setting introduction and offered my best practices suggestions for follow-up. Since targets, a.k.a. decision-makers, have become expert time managers who are reluctant to create bandwith for new business relationships, these first two steps are truly the hardest. Congratulations on successfully securing a meeting! Best case scenario, the target now perceives you as potentially valuable. Worst case, you have at least cracked the “no” shell, the target has lowered her defenses (sorry, I just saw Star Trek), and she is willing to give you 20 minutes over coffee.
However, this is a pass or fail course. You only pass if the meeting yields a meaningful next step. In the context of a job search, that can mean a) securing a formal interview, b) getting some project work to provide value and prove yourself in the absence of a job opening or c) receiving a referral to an opportunity elsewhere. By listening well, you will learn early in the sit-down if “a” or “b” is a near-term possibility. At the end of your meeting, seek the most realistic action step.
You will pass by truly connecting with the target. So, now we get to the heart of this column. Make the meeting all about the target and her company, and not at all about you. That's how you really “blow their socks off.” Ask Ms. Big what business challenge interrupts her sleep at 3 a.m. What does she enjoy most about her company? What could save her time? How does she measure success?
Please resist the urge to say “hire me,” or any variation thereof, as a solution to the target's challenges. She knows why you are there. The elegant way to succeed in this environment is to demonstrate two great lawyer qualities–discernment and empathy. As the target opens up based on your client focused line of questions, try responding with comments that begin like this: “I appreciate the corporate politics involved in that,” and offer an example of how you can relate to her challenges. Or, “Interesting, thank you for sharing that with me,” followed by “have you considered xyz?”
But be careful, the “have you considered xyz” part is risky and should only be used if you actually have something useful to say. If in doubt, “thank you for sharing” is powerful enough on its own.
Of course, the target will politely ask about you before her coffee cup is empty. Understanding the difference between an informational meeting and a formal job interview is critical here. Interviewing is a competitive and structured process. Please check back here next month for my advice on interviewing. It may surprise you to learn that I advocate a far more self-promotional approach to interviewing.
In the coffee meeting context, use the “tell me about you” opportunity to build rapport. Talk about family or personal interests immediately. Avoid a resume recitation. Your goal is to establish a connection. Be open, unguarded, and say something interesting. Most importantly, be yourself and crack a smile.
When you get good at this, you will rarely even need to ask for the next action step. Instead, the target herself will ask, “So, what can I do to help you?”
Attorneys are self-confident individuals. If only I had a dime for every time I heard… “If I can just get in the door, I'll blow their socks off.”
In the last two columns, I covered how to make a conference-setting introduction and offered my best practices suggestions for follow-up. Since targets, a.k.a. decision-makers, have become expert time managers who are reluctant to create bandwith for new business relationships, these first two steps are truly the hardest. Congratulations on successfully securing a meeting! Best case scenario, the target now perceives you as potentially valuable. Worst case, you have at least cracked the “no” shell, the target has lowered her defenses (sorry, I just saw Star Trek), and she is willing to give you 20 minutes over coffee.
However, this is a pass or fail course. You only pass if the meeting yields a meaningful next step. In the context of a job search, that can mean a) securing a formal interview, b) getting some project work to provide value and prove yourself in the absence of a job opening or c) receiving a referral to an opportunity elsewhere. By listening well, you will learn early in the sit-down if “a” or “b” is a near-term possibility. At the end of your meeting, seek the most realistic action step.
You will pass by truly connecting with the target. So, now we get to the heart of this column. Make the meeting all about the target and her company, and not at all about you. That's how you really “blow their socks off.” Ask Ms. Big what business challenge interrupts her sleep at 3 a.m. What does she enjoy most about her company? What could save her time? How does she measure success?
Please resist the urge to say “hire me,” or any variation thereof, as a solution to the target's challenges. She knows why you are there. The elegant way to succeed in this environment is to demonstrate two great lawyer qualities–discernment and empathy. As the target opens up based on your client focused line of questions, try responding with comments that begin like this: “I appreciate the corporate politics involved in that,” and offer an example of how you can relate to her challenges. Or, “Interesting, thank you for sharing that with me,” followed by “have you considered xyz?”
But be careful, the “have you considered xyz” part is risky and should only be used if you actually have something useful to say. If in doubt, “thank you for sharing” is powerful enough on its own.
Of course, the target will politely ask about you before her coffee cup is empty. Understanding the difference between an informational meeting and a formal job interview is critical here. Interviewing is a competitive and structured process. Please check back here next month for my advice on interviewing. It may surprise you to learn that I advocate a far more self-promotional approach to interviewing.
In the coffee meeting context, use the “tell me about you” opportunity to build rapport. Talk about family or personal interests immediately. Avoid a resume recitation. Your goal is to establish a connection. Be open, unguarded, and say something interesting. Most importantly, be yourself and crack a smile.
When you get good at this, you will rarely even need to ask for the next action step. Instead, the target herself will ask, “So, what can I do to help you?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
- 2Steve Bannon 'We Build The Wall' Fraud Trial Pushed to February 2025
- 3'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
- 4Questions About Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act Remain Unanswered
- 5Santa Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250