Hiring Help: How to create a win-win situation for your business and potential employees
Create a win-win situation for your business and potential employees.
July 31, 2009 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
Most people think of business recruitment as a single process. But building a great inside legal team requires two very different, but equally important, disciplines: locating the right talent and then interviewing the top prospects in a manner that will determine the best possible candidate for your organization.
At Kaplan Higher Education, we are currently searching for an associate general counsel with specific skills. In the past, we have relied almost exclusively on professional networking and word-of-mouth recommendations to identify talented candidates. We had always considered legal search firms too costly and not sufficiently attuned to our company's needs. This time, however, we decided to alter our usual approach. Since time was of the essence, we reasoned that a qualified search firm specializing in legal placements could facilitate the process in much the same way as a good real estate broker who knows the market.
With proper guidance, the legal search firm we retained provided outstanding service, saving our team many hours of fishing in the legal talent pool. Not only do knowledgeable legal recruiters offer a broad and deep view of the marketplace, they also provide an opportunity to comparison shop more effectively. Through their extensive screening and interview processes, recruiters can provide invaluable insight gleaned from spending in-depth time with a large pool of applicants. Additionally, good search firms work to build a thorough understanding not only of the position for which you are currently hiring, but of your organization as well.
Streamlining the candidate recruitment process is just the first step, however. Once the search firm presents appropriate candidates, it is up to us to ask the right questions, introduce the applicants to the right people and clearly communicate what we are looking for in a quality lawyer.
Here are some tips to identify the best legal candidate for your organization:
1. Ensure that you are able to interview the top applicants several times in multiple settings. It can be remarkable how differently a candidate interviews from one day to the next.
2. Clearly outline to your interviewers what skills, experience and attributes are most important for the position.
3. Include different personalities and key stakeholders in the interview process, including a member of your human resources team. Gain feedback from each interviewer to see how he or she envisions regular interactions with the candidate.
A most effective interview technique is to obtain the applicant's reaction to hypothetical “real-life” scenarios. For example, you might say, “It's 11 a.m. in New York, and the following three things happen in rapid succession: There's a fire at a company facility in California, a media reporter calls you with questions about a lawsuit that has been filed but not yet served on your company, and your advertising team has forgotten to send you ad copy–which now needs legal review for a commercial scheduled to air the next day. What do you do first, second, third and so forth?”
Faced with some of the potential issues that are part of the actual job, candidates quickly gain a better understanding of the position and its responsibilities. And you have the opportunity to gauge their reactions and examine their crisis management and communication skills, as well as their ability to handle stressful situations. In the end, this is better for you and for the candidate who wants to know what the job will require.
Hiring a lawyer with the capabilities and professional attributes that complement your department and your organization is a true win-win. You strengthen your department and ensure that your organization receives a high-quality level of service from your legal team, and the candidate finds his or her next ideal career move.
Most people think of business recruitment as a single process. But building a great inside legal team requires two very different, but equally important, disciplines: locating the right talent and then interviewing the top prospects in a manner that will determine the best possible candidate for your organization.
At Kaplan Higher Education, we are currently searching for an associate general counsel with specific skills. In the past, we have relied almost exclusively on professional networking and word-of-mouth recommendations to identify talented candidates. We had always considered legal search firms too costly and not sufficiently attuned to our company's needs. This time, however, we decided to alter our usual approach. Since time was of the essence, we reasoned that a qualified search firm specializing in legal placements could facilitate the process in much the same way as a good real estate broker who knows the market.
With proper guidance, the legal search firm we retained provided outstanding service, saving our team many hours of fishing in the legal talent pool. Not only do knowledgeable legal recruiters offer a broad and deep view of the marketplace, they also provide an opportunity to comparison shop more effectively. Through their extensive screening and interview processes, recruiters can provide invaluable insight gleaned from spending in-depth time with a large pool of applicants. Additionally, good search firms work to build a thorough understanding not only of the position for which you are currently hiring, but of your organization as well.
Streamlining the candidate recruitment process is just the first step, however. Once the search firm presents appropriate candidates, it is up to us to ask the right questions, introduce the applicants to the right people and clearly communicate what we are looking for in a quality lawyer.
Here are some tips to identify the best legal candidate for your organization:
1. Ensure that you are able to interview the top applicants several times in multiple settings. It can be remarkable how differently a candidate interviews from one day to the next.
2. Clearly outline to your interviewers what skills, experience and attributes are most important for the position.
3. Include different personalities and key stakeholders in the interview process, including a member of your human resources team. Gain feedback from each interviewer to see how he or she envisions regular interactions with the candidate.
A most effective interview technique is to obtain the applicant's reaction to hypothetical “real-life” scenarios. For example, you might say, “It's 11 a.m. in
Faced with some of the potential issues that are part of the actual job, candidates quickly gain a better understanding of the position and its responsibilities. And you have the opportunity to gauge their reactions and examine their crisis management and communication skills, as well as their ability to handle stressful situations. In the end, this is better for you and for the candidate who wants to know what the job will require.
Hiring a lawyer with the capabilities and professional attributes that complement your department and your organization is a true win-win. You strengthen your department and ensure that your organization receives a high-quality level of service from your legal team, and the candidate finds his or her next ideal career move.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
GCs Jettisoning Zero-Based Budgeting in Quest to Be Nimble, More Efficient
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250