Making the Connection: Successful legal departments must reflect diversity of the nation
Successful legal departments must reflect the diversity of the nation.
July 31, 2009 at 08:00 PM
7 minute read
Companies, particularly consumer products companies such as Coca-Cola, are only successful to the extent they connect emotionally with consumers. That connection is grounded in an appeal that is familiar.
A personalized experience, whether the foundation for marketing a product or a point of differentiation in a service business, is all about affinity. It is about meeting the consumers where they are. It is about striking resonant themes that speak to their experiences, backgrounds, beliefs, personal challenges and core values. It is about respecting and understanding their “differentness.”
It is about leveraging all of the ethnic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic touch points that drive business success.
As lawyers, we are all too familiar with the power of affinity. After all, our profession is the quintessential “contact sport”–an avocation where professional success is informed not just by technical expertise but by relationships–family relationships, community contacts, college and law school contacts, clerkships and the like. As lawyers, our professional success is informed by pedigree, mentors, “rabbis,” stakeholders and a host of other external forces that really have no direct connections to the intellectual exercise of lawyering.
Companies, as successful in-house lawyers quickly learn, are relationship-driven organisms. Whatever your company's business, the relationships that form its value chain–whether relationships with customers, distributors, franchisees, employees, contractors, vendors, community contacts or industry contacts–are as critical to driving successful business outcomes as operational excellence, financial stewardship or other critical business functions. As in-house lawyers, we are also concerned with the regulatory and governmental landscape, as well as the judges, media interests, jury pools and political influences that impact the legal risks our internal clients face.
But who are these affinity contacts? Who are the customers, distributors, franchisees, employees, contractors, vendors, community contacts, industry contacts, judges, potential jurors and political figures in your company's or your law department's value chain? What will these affinity contacts look like 10 or 20 years from now?
Fortunately, we need not consult a crystal ball for the answer. Demographers tell us all we need to know about the people who currently populate and will populate our world. We know that today, one in three people in the world live in two countries–China and India. We know that African-American spending power, if aggregated, amounts to the tenth largest economy in the world–larger than the economies of Australia and Mexico. We know that by 2040, Latinos will be the largest demographic group in the U.S. In fact, today, California's Latino buying power exceeds the total buying power (all groups) of 37 of the 50 states. We know American women account for some 85 percent of the purchasing decisions in U.S. households today. We know that Asian-Americans are a fast-growing constituency of millionaires in the U.S.
It seems that the ever-changing diverse business world poses some unique challenges for nondiverse organizations, particularly corporate law departments. Because how can a profession in which minorities and women are underrepresented realistically guide businesses through the legal problems facing a diverse world? How can a homogenous law department or law firm assist a global company in capturing the untold business opportunities provided by a larger, wealthier, better educated, more sophisticated ethnic minority consumer base or business constituency?
It means we must be the catalysts for new affinity paradigms in our companies, in our communities and in our profession. We are uniquely positioned for this important work as ambassadors of our companies and stewards of our profession.
If not us, then who?
Companies, particularly consumer products companies such as Coca-Cola, are only successful to the extent they connect emotionally with consumers. That connection is grounded in an appeal that is familiar.
A personalized experience, whether the foundation for marketing a product or a point of differentiation in a service business, is all about affinity. It is about meeting the consumers where they are. It is about striking resonant themes that speak to their experiences, backgrounds, beliefs, personal challenges and core values. It is about respecting and understanding their “differentness.”
It is about leveraging all of the ethnic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic touch points that drive business success.
As lawyers, we are all too familiar with the power of affinity. After all, our profession is the quintessential “contact sport”–an avocation where professional success is informed not just by technical expertise but by relationships–family relationships, community contacts, college and law school contacts, clerkships and the like. As lawyers, our professional success is informed by pedigree, mentors, “rabbis,” stakeholders and a host of other external forces that really have no direct connections to the intellectual exercise of lawyering.
Companies, as successful in-house lawyers quickly learn, are relationship-driven organisms. Whatever your company's business, the relationships that form its value chain–whether relationships with customers, distributors, franchisees, employees, contractors, vendors, community contacts or industry contacts–are as critical to driving successful business outcomes as operational excellence, financial stewardship or other critical business functions. As in-house lawyers, we are also concerned with the regulatory and governmental landscape, as well as the judges, media interests, jury pools and political influences that impact the legal risks our internal clients face.
But who are these affinity contacts? Who are the customers, distributors, franchisees, employees, contractors, vendors, community contacts, industry contacts, judges, potential jurors and political figures in your company's or your law department's value chain? What will these affinity contacts look like 10 or 20 years from now?
Fortunately, we need not consult a crystal ball for the answer. Demographers tell us all we need to know about the people who currently populate and will populate our world. We know that today, one in three people in the world live in two countries–China and India. We know that African-American spending power, if aggregated, amounts to the tenth largest economy in the world–larger than the economies of Australia and Mexico. We know that by 2040, Latinos will be the largest demographic group in the U.S. In fact, today, California's Latino buying power exceeds the total buying power (all groups) of 37 of the 50 states. We know American women account for some 85 percent of the purchasing decisions in U.S. households today. We know that Asian-Americans are a fast-growing constituency of millionaires in the U.S.
It seems that the ever-changing diverse business world poses some unique challenges for nondiverse organizations, particularly corporate law departments. Because how can a profession in which minorities and women are underrepresented realistically guide businesses through the legal problems facing a diverse world? How can a homogenous law department or law firm assist a global company in capturing the untold business opportunities provided by a larger, wealthier, better educated, more sophisticated ethnic minority consumer base or business constituency?
It means we must be the catalysts for new affinity paradigms in our companies, in our communities and in our profession. We are uniquely positioned for this important work as ambassadors of our companies and stewards of our profession.
If not us, then who?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpotify GC Steps Down, Opts to 'Step Away From Full-Time Corporate Life'
2 minute readLinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
5 minute readAre Firms and In-House Teams Courting Technological Debt With Ambitious Purchases?
6 minute readStarbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
Trending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250