Selecting the Best Candidate
Many interviewers trust their gut when picking a winner. What does that really mean?
August 16, 2009 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
I know within three minutes of meeting an attorney if he or she will interview well. All of the key elements discussed in last month's column, “Winning at the Interview,” show themselves quickly: self-confidence, likeability, presentation, etc. Winners are succinct, intelligent and engaging from the outset. But I also meet a lot of windbags, as well as surprisingly inarticulate lawyers.
Once making it through this cut, however, an employer faces the more difficult challenge of selecting the person who will actually become the most productive performer. Employers shouldn't be seduced into simply picking the most charismatic interviewee. When a client says, “I'm trusting my gut” and going with candidate xyz, I worry that we may have been charmed. Great interviewee does not always translate into great employee.
To make the best selection, you have to go deeper. Situational interviewing is very helpful. Ask your recruiter or human resources team for examples of how to do this. Also, don't be shy about asking some uncomfortable questions. Press people on why a short-tenured position did not work out, emphasizing what the candidate could have done differently. Reward candor over blame-shifting.
Look for objective indicia of success that may not be evident in the resume. Time spent in customer service, perhaps as a waiter or waitress during school, helps build work ethic and people skills. It often teaches a little healthy humility. Ask about competitions entered, even if these go back to school: theater auditions, sports, essay contests, etc. Winning is less important than entering, although winning is a plus. We want evidence that someone has fire-in-the-belly and takes initiative. Later in life examples include volunteerism, townhome board service, coaching little league, 5k runs, etc.
Hire the candidate who shows a positive and well rounded zest for life. The inside counsel role is stressful, political and full of long days. Cynicism, ego and negativity will all show up when dealing with red tape and the imperfections of any corporation. This will sound like a corny line from a motivational speech, but it's true: Attitude is everything. And that's why the interview process can be a trap for many employers. An intelligent and charismatic interviewee can project the right attitude. So look hard for real examples of a full and happy life. When your “gut feeling” is supported by this kind of evidence, then you are making the best selection.
I know within three minutes of meeting an attorney if he or she will interview well. All of the key elements discussed in last month's column, “Winning at the Interview,” show themselves quickly: self-confidence, likeability, presentation, etc. Winners are succinct, intelligent and engaging from the outset. But I also meet a lot of windbags, as well as surprisingly inarticulate lawyers.
Once making it through this cut, however, an employer faces the more difficult challenge of selecting the person who will actually become the most productive performer. Employers shouldn't be seduced into simply picking the most charismatic interviewee. When a client says, “I'm trusting my gut” and going with candidate xyz, I worry that we may have been charmed. Great interviewee does not always translate into great employee.
To make the best selection, you have to go deeper. Situational interviewing is very helpful. Ask your recruiter or human resources team for examples of how to do this. Also, don't be shy about asking some uncomfortable questions. Press people on why a short-tenured position did not work out, emphasizing what the candidate could have done differently. Reward candor over blame-shifting.
Look for objective indicia of success that may not be evident in the resume. Time spent in customer service, perhaps as a waiter or waitress during school, helps build work ethic and people skills. It often teaches a little healthy humility. Ask about competitions entered, even if these go back to school: theater auditions, sports, essay contests, etc. Winning is less important than entering, although winning is a plus. We want evidence that someone has fire-in-the-belly and takes initiative. Later in life examples include volunteerism, townhome board service, coaching little league, 5k runs, etc.
Hire the candidate who shows a positive and well rounded zest for life. The inside counsel role is stressful, political and full of long days. Cynicism, ego and negativity will all show up when dealing with red tape and the imperfections of any corporation. This will sound like a corny line from a motivational speech, but it's true: Attitude is everything. And that's why the interview process can be a trap for many employers. An intelligent and charismatic interviewee can project the right attitude. So look hard for real examples of a full and happy life. When your “gut feeling” is supported by this kind of evidence, then you are making the best selection.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Steve Bannon 'We Build The Wall' Fraud Trial Pushed to February 2025
- 2'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
- 3Questions About Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act Remain Unanswered
- 4Santa Clara County Superior Court Authorizes Electronic Recording of Proceedings
- 5Ex-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250