Creative Thinking: Managing a legal department requires patience, understanding and the ability to think outside the box
Managing a legal department requires patience, understanding and the ability to think outside the box.
August 31, 2009 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
Back in January, when I gave birth to my first child, I honestly thought, “How hard can this really be?” I enjoy feeding him when he's hungry, soothing him when he's fussy and changing his diaper when it's dirty. And that certainly helps with regard to how much is “work” and how much is “fun” to me as a mom.
But sometimes (drum roll, please), it isn't as easy as I originally thought. Sometimes he wakes up so hungry that it's hard to get him to settle down. Sometimes he's fussy for no reason and nothing seems to calm him down. As for his diaper, I'll leave that to the imagination.
As a result, I have found myself in quite a few situations where I've had to put my creative genes into overdrive. Case in point: There are times when my son gets so worked up that he's crying too hard to keep his pacifier–the most calming device in our arsenal–in his mouth. But I've discovered that if I dip the pacifier in a flavored beverage such as grape juice, he holds onto it and is able to suck on it long enough to calm himself down. It works every single time, and has been a “best practice” in my house for a few months now.
While raising a child and managing a legal department are drastically different tasks, they both require common qualities: patience, understanding and the ability to “think outside of the box.”
In this month's cover story–announcing our annual IC-10 (“Game Changers“)–we profile 10 of 2009's most innovative legal departments. This year, the solutions that IC-10 winners have come up with run the gamut. For example, one legal department–in the interest of slashing its spend on legal services–challenged the common practice of using only big-name law firms to handle its work, and in the process saved substantially and lowered its risk. Another legal department instituted an exchange program with its international offices in an effort to help its in-house lawyers better understand the global business. A third department created an easy-to-carry reference card to help its employees keep compliance top-of-mind–a reminder that, like dunking the pacifier in fruit juice, sometimes the simplest solutions are the most effective.
Whether it's a long thought-out plan implemented over a period of time or a quick solution to a common problem, these 10 legal departments used innovation to create efficiencies and improve efficacy within their departments. Each of their stories offers a valuable lesson: Creativity always pays off.
Back in January, when I gave birth to my first child, I honestly thought, “How hard can this really be?” I enjoy feeding him when he's hungry, soothing him when he's fussy and changing his diaper when it's dirty. And that certainly helps with regard to how much is “work” and how much is “fun” to me as a mom.
But sometimes (drum roll, please), it isn't as easy as I originally thought. Sometimes he wakes up so hungry that it's hard to get him to settle down. Sometimes he's fussy for no reason and nothing seems to calm him down. As for his diaper, I'll leave that to the imagination.
As a result, I have found myself in quite a few situations where I've had to put my creative genes into overdrive. Case in point: There are times when my son gets so worked up that he's crying too hard to keep his pacifier–the most calming device in our arsenal–in his mouth. But I've discovered that if I dip the pacifier in a flavored beverage such as grape juice, he holds onto it and is able to suck on it long enough to calm himself down. It works every single time, and has been a “best practice” in my house for a few months now.
While raising a child and managing a legal department are drastically different tasks, they both require common qualities: patience, understanding and the ability to “think outside of the box.”
In this month's cover story–announcing our annual IC-10 (“Game Changers“)–we profile 10 of 2009's most innovative legal departments. This year, the solutions that IC-10 winners have come up with run the gamut. For example, one legal department–in the interest of slashing its spend on legal services–challenged the common practice of using only big-name law firms to handle its work, and in the process saved substantially and lowered its risk. Another legal department instituted an exchange program with its international offices in an effort to help its in-house lawyers better understand the global business. A third department created an easy-to-carry reference card to help its employees keep compliance top-of-mind–a reminder that, like dunking the pacifier in fruit juice, sometimes the simplest solutions are the most effective.
Whether it's a long thought-out plan implemented over a period of time or a quick solution to a common problem, these 10 legal departments used innovation to create efficiencies and improve efficacy within their departments. Each of their stories offers a valuable lesson: Creativity always pays off.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250