Hair of the Dog
The FURminator is a pet brush that owners will celebrate.
September 30, 2009 at 08:00 PM
5 minute read
About a year ago, the owner of my neighborhood pet store showed me a dog brush they'd gotten in, the FURminator. I was indifferent–it was just a dog brush. Then the owner loaded up an online video showing the brush swiftly removing from a golden retriever a pile of fur bigger than the dog itself. I was floored. Even though shedding had never been a major problem with Penny, my pitifully short-haired pit bull, I had to have that miracle brush.
I brought Penny into the shop to try the FURminator on her–nothing. She just didn't have enough fur for the brush to make any difference.
But things change. Recently Penny was diagnosed with hypothyroidism. One of the condition's symptoms in dogs is a sparse, thin coat. The medication to treat it did wonders for my dog's health–and her fur. For the first time, I was left with a handful of what looked and felt like dandelion fluff every time I ran my fingers through her coat. My lucky days of a shed-free dog were over. The fluff matted on my furniture, floated through rays of sunlight like dust motes, clogged drains. The first time I coughed up something resembling a hairball, I turned to my newly hirsute pooch. “I know what we need,” I told her.
This time, I got to see the full effects of the FURminator. The brush works by tackling a dog's undercoat–the dandelion fluff with which I'm now well acquainted. The brush doesn't cut or rip anything, instead catching and removing the loose undercoat the dog has already shed but is still wearing around.
After half an hour with Penny, the FURminator yielded a big pile of fluffy undercoat, which went directly into the garbage rather than onto the furniture. After just one session, the shedding was gone. For the first time I could run my fingers through her coat and come away fluff-free. And the effects last–the FURminator promises to reduce shedding for four to six weeks.
The FURminator is pricier than most dog brushes–even some salon-grade hair brushes for humans don't run this high–but the brush has saved me from a life lived in a vortex of dog fluff, and as an allergy sufferer it has been a lifesaver. I wouldn't even imagine having a long-haired dog now without a FURminator, and friends with a golden retriever also swear by the brush.
The FURminator de-shedding tool is available in small, medium, large, feline and equine models, which range from $34.99 to $69.99 (MSRP) in pet stores. The demo videos that won me over are online at furminator.com.
About a year ago, the owner of my neighborhood pet store showed me a dog brush they'd gotten in, the FURminator. I was indifferent–it was just a dog brush. Then the owner loaded up an online video showing the brush swiftly removing from a golden retriever a pile of fur bigger than the dog itself. I was floored. Even though shedding had never been a major problem with Penny, my pitifully short-haired pit bull, I had to have that miracle brush.
I brought Penny into the shop to try the FURminator on her–nothing. She just didn't have enough fur for the brush to make any difference.
But things change. Recently Penny was diagnosed with hypothyroidism. One of the condition's symptoms in dogs is a sparse, thin coat. The medication to treat it did wonders for my dog's health–and her fur. For the first time, I was left with a handful of what looked and felt like dandelion fluff every time I ran my fingers through her coat. My lucky days of a shed-free dog were over. The fluff matted on my furniture, floated through rays of sunlight like dust motes, clogged drains. The first time I coughed up something resembling a hairball, I turned to my newly hirsute pooch. “I know what we need,” I told her.
This time, I got to see the full effects of the FURminator. The brush works by tackling a dog's undercoat–the dandelion fluff with which I'm now well acquainted. The brush doesn't cut or rip anything, instead catching and removing the loose undercoat the dog has already shed but is still wearing around.
After half an hour with Penny, the FURminator yielded a big pile of fluffy undercoat, which went directly into the garbage rather than onto the furniture. After just one session, the shedding was gone. For the first time I could run my fingers through her coat and come away fluff-free. And the effects last–the FURminator promises to reduce shedding for four to six weeks.
The FURminator is pricier than most dog brushes–even some salon-grade hair brushes for humans don't run this high–but the brush has saved me from a life lived in a vortex of dog fluff, and as an allergy sufferer it has been a lifesaver. I wouldn't even imagine having a long-haired dog now without a FURminator, and friends with a golden retriever also swear by the brush.
The FURminator de-shedding tool is available in small, medium, large, feline and equine models, which range from $34.99 to $69.99 (MSRP) in pet stores. The demo videos that won me over are online at furminator.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250