E-Mail Efficacy
With electronic communication such a regular part of our lives, it can be easy to forget the basics.
November 30, 2009 at 07:00 PM
7 minute read
In many organizations, e-mail is the primary means of communication. E-mail provides a seamless way for everyone to stay in contact despite all of the factors–such as travel, multiple office locations and telecommuting–that can prevent in-person meetings or even telephone calls. E-mail offers the convenience, and strategic advantage, of sharing information in real time with key decision makers. As such, e-mail presents a golden opportunity for attorneys to demonstrate value to their clients and strengthen the attorney-client
relationship. Yet all too often, the e-mail we receive from outside counsel is more frustrating than helpful.
Just to take a few examples: subject lines that are unrelated to content or that are missing altogether; paragraph after paragraph of unnecessary prelude that obscures important information; or writing in “legalese” that needs comprehensive translation. These mistakes transform e-mail from newsflashes into headaches.
The irony is that attorneys possess a skill set that should shine in the context of e-mail: the ability to synthesize information and present it clearly and persuasively. But the same outside counsel who can hold a courtroom spellbound can, without even realizing it, write an e-mail that loses its audience. The attorneys who are best at communicating via e-mail recognize that the format is fundamentally different than a conversation or a written formal letter, and they tailor their messages accordingly.
Some techniques I encourage among the attorneys on my team are as follows:
- Consider your audience. These days, more people than ever are reading their e-mail on a Blackberry, iPhone or other mobile device rather than a large monitor. The takeaway: Keep your e-mail short and to the point.
- Make the subject line count. Your subject line should accurately tell the reader what the message is about. Your audience may receive a lot of e-mail every day. They may need to decide which emails to read based only on the subject line and opening line of text. By the same token, use discretion when labeling your messages “urgent.” Doing so in the absence of a real emergency is a sure-fire way to reduce your chances of getting through when there truly is an immediate need.
- It's an “elevator speech.” In recognition of everyone's busy schedule, one thing we try to instill at Kaplan Higher Education is the ability to make a persuasive “elevator speech.” Present your idea or information quickly–say, in the amount of time it might take to travel a few floors in an elevator. If you can't summarize your position in an elevator speech, you probably need to rethink it and identify the essential points.
- Set out the options. If your e-mail identifies a decision to be made, give a concise analysis and a clear recommendation of how to proceed. Your advice will help your client save time and make a decision, as well as highlight your ability to stake out a closely reasoned position.
- Speak plain English. Finally, recognize that the e-mail recipient may wish to share it with colleagues or internal clients, not all of whom may be lawyers. An e-mail written in plain English allows your audience to forward your message with minimal additional comments–a hallmark of effective advocacy.
What do these guidelines have in common? A deep respect for the audience and a commitment to be helpful. The outside counsel who “get it” are those who maximize e-mail communication by sending messages that get to the point, offer recommendations and can be forwarded to executives with minimal comments. Those are the outside counsel you keep.
In many organizations, e-mail is the primary means of communication. E-mail provides a seamless way for everyone to stay in contact despite all of the factors–such as travel, multiple office locations and telecommuting–that can prevent in-person meetings or even telephone calls. E-mail offers the convenience, and strategic advantage, of sharing information in real time with key decision makers. As such, e-mail presents a golden opportunity for attorneys to demonstrate value to their clients and strengthen the attorney-client
relationship. Yet all too often, the e-mail we receive from outside counsel is more frustrating than helpful.
Just to take a few examples: subject lines that are unrelated to content or that are missing altogether; paragraph after paragraph of unnecessary prelude that obscures important information; or writing in “legalese” that needs comprehensive translation. These mistakes transform e-mail from newsflashes into headaches.
The irony is that attorneys possess a skill set that should shine in the context of e-mail: the ability to synthesize information and present it clearly and persuasively. But the same outside counsel who can hold a courtroom spellbound can, without even realizing it, write an e-mail that loses its audience. The attorneys who are best at communicating via e-mail recognize that the format is fundamentally different than a conversation or a written formal letter, and they tailor their messages accordingly.
Some techniques I encourage among the attorneys on my team are as follows:
- Consider your audience. These days, more people than ever are reading their e-mail on a Blackberry, iPhone or other mobile device rather than a large monitor. The takeaway: Keep your e-mail short and to the point.
- Make the subject line count. Your subject line should accurately tell the reader what the message is about. Your audience may receive a lot of e-mail every day. They may need to decide which emails to read based only on the subject line and opening line of text. By the same token, use discretion when labeling your messages “urgent.” Doing so in the absence of a real emergency is a sure-fire way to reduce your chances of getting through when there truly is an immediate need.
- It's an “elevator speech.” In recognition of everyone's busy schedule, one thing we try to instill at Kaplan Higher Education is the ability to make a persuasive “elevator speech.” Present your idea or information quickly–say, in the amount of time it might take to travel a few floors in an elevator. If you can't summarize your position in an elevator speech, you probably need to rethink it and identify the essential points.
- Set out the options. If your e-mail identifies a decision to be made, give a concise analysis and a clear recommendation of how to proceed. Your advice will help your client save time and make a decision, as well as highlight your ability to stake out a closely reasoned position.
- Speak plain English. Finally, recognize that the e-mail recipient may wish to share it with colleagues or internal clients, not all of whom may be lawyers. An e-mail written in plain English allows your audience to forward your message with minimal additional comments–a hallmark of effective advocacy.
What do these guidelines have in common? A deep respect for the audience and a commitment to be helpful. The outside counsel who “get it” are those who maximize e-mail communication by sending messages that get to the point, offer recommendations and can be forwarded to executives with minimal comments. Those are the outside counsel you keep.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
White Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250